Borna Gojo vs Cem Ilkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Gojo vs C. Ilkel

Borna Gojo

CRO

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

291

C. Rank

586

Best Rank

144

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$669.6K

Career Money

$225.5K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Cem Ilkel

TUR

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

291

C. Rank

586

Best Rank

144

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$669.6K

Career Money

$225.5K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Gojo 0 - 1 Ilkel

They have played 3 sets in total, with Borna Gojo winning 1 and Cem Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Borna Gojo was at the Winnipeg Challenger, 08-07-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gojo	0
Ilkel	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Winnipeg Challenger(07-08-19)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Borna Gojo

B. Gojo vs C. Ilkel H2H Profile

B. Gojo	Stats	C. Ilkel
$669,560	Career Prize Money	$225,530
58.37% (258-184)	Career Total W/L	56.52% (438-337)
0	Hard	1
2	Titles	7
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-5)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Gojo vs C. Ilkel Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Borna Gojo has won 44.77% of points on their second serve, while Cem Ilkel has won 67.50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Borna Gojo, in recent form, has won 44.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cem Ilkel has won 45.90%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.83% and 14.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Borna Gojo has saved 56.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cem Ilkel has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Borna Gojo has won 51.35% of matches played (W/L 19/18), with Cem Ilkel winning 71.43% (W/L 30/12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Borna Gojo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 122/77), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 10/13). Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9).
Player level: In the last year, Borna Gojo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.89% of matches (W/L 11/8), where as Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Borna Gojo winning 0 times and Cem Ilkel being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Borna Gojo winning 1 and Cem Ilkel winning 2.
The last match between Borna Gojo and Cem Ilkel was at the Winnipeg Challenger, 08-07-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:7.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Borna Gojo has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.78 while Cem Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 424.21.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Borna Gojo has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cem Ilkel has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Borna Gojo has converted 27.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cem Ilkel has converted 12.50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Borna Gojo vs Cem Ilkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Gojo vs C. Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Gojo	Stats	C. Ilkel
0	H2H Matches Won	1
1	Sets Won	2
13	Games Won	16
4	Aces (Total)	11
2	Total Double Faults	4
2:16:7	Average Match Time	2:16:7
54% (46/85)	1st Serve %	72% (81/112)
85% (39/46)	1st Serve Win %	63% (51/81)
46% (18/39)	2nd Serve Win %	71% (22/31)
8% (1/13)	Break Pts Won %	20% (2/10)
35% (39/112)	Return Points Win %	33% (28/85)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Gojo Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Sascha Gueymard WayenburgS. Gueymard	L	3-6 7-6(2) 6-4	Stats
Olbia Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Martin LandaluceM. Landaluce	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
R1 Francesco FortiF. Forti	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
Roanne Challenger - 06-10-2025
R2 Hugo GastonH. Gaston	L	5-7 7-6(3) 7-5	Stats
R1 Clement ChidekhC. Chidekh	W	6-0 4-6 7-5	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Gojo vs C. Ilkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Gojo	Stats	C. Ilkel
58.37% (258/184)	YTD Win/Loss	56.52% (438/337)
56.60% (600/460)	Sets Win/Loss	54.63% (979/813)
52.51% (5519/4992)	Games Win/Loss	51.54% (8791/8267)
61.31% (122/77)	Hard Win/Loss	61.41% (288/181)
54.87% (62/51)	Clay Win/Loss	44.53% (57/71)
59.81% (64/43)	Indoor Hard W/L	54.76% (92/76)
43.48% (10/13)	Grass Win/Loss	10.00% (1/9)
0.66	Aces Per Game	0.34
3401	Aces Total	2865
0.28	Double Faults Per Game	0.17
1433	Total Double Faults	1385
1:37:46	Average Match Time	1:15:9
438.74	Average Opponent Rank	560.68
62% (19757/31639)	1st Serve %	58% (24152/41308)
74% (14580/19757)	1st Serve Win %	70% (16999/24152)
49% (5864/11882)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (8757/17156)
40% (1085/2705)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1622/4023)
37% (11619/31158)	Return Points Win %	39% (16247/41803)
56.25% (18/14)	Slam W/L	31.82% (7/15)
50.00% (7/7)	Masters W/L	66.67% (2/1)
60.00% (9/6)	Cups W/L	31.82% (7/15)
48.94% (23/24)	Main Tour W/L	17.86% (5/23)
60.47% (153/100)	Challenger W/L	52.23% (176/161)
59.26% (48/33)	Futures W/L	66.39% (241/122)
58% (252/433)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (426/756)
63% (5/8)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (4/10)
52% (113/217)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (147/275)
52% (87/168)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (130/233)
82% (261/213)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (424/362)
18% (261/48)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (424/60)
24% (180/43)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (350/74)