Blaise Bicknell vs Mathis Bondaz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Oct at 05:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Bicknell vs M. Bondaz

JAM
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bicknell 1 - 0 Bondaz
They have played 3 sets in total, with Blaise Bicknell winning 2 and Mathis Bondaz winning 1. The last match between Blaise Bicknell and Mathis Bondaz was at the M25 Norman, 23-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Blaise Bicknell getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bicknell | 1 |
| Bondaz | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Norman(10-23-25)
B. Bicknell vs M. Bondaz H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.94% (119-90) | Career Total W/L | 55.26% (21-17) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Bicknell vs M. Bondaz Match Preview:
- Blaise Bicknell has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 43.10% of points compared to Mathis Bondaz's 39.65% over the past six months. How does this impact match prediction? It suggests a narrow advantage for Bicknell on serve stability.
- In return games, Mathis Bondaz shows superior performance, winning 45.35% of opponent's second serve points, outperforming Bicknell's 41.62%. Will this make a difference in breaking serve? It certainly positions Bondaz as the stronger returner.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Bondaz also has the upper hand, capturing 32.72% compared to Bicknell's 27.16%. This indicates Bondaz may capitalize better on first serve return opportunities.
- Under pressure, Bicknell excels at saving breakpoints, succeeding in 54.75% of instances, whereas Bondaz manages 44.86%. This suggests Bicknell may handle critical moments more effectively.
- Looking at overall match performance in the last year, Bondaz has a higher win rate at 70.00% (W/L 14/6), whereas Bicknell's rate is 54.05% (W/L 20/17). Does this make Bondaz the likely winner? Historically yes, based on better match outcomes.
- Both players perform best on hard surfaces with a win rate of 61%, but Bicknell struggles most on indoor hard (17%), and Bondaz on clay (33%).
- Bondaz has slightly higher success in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at 73.68% (W/L 14/5), overtaking Bicknell's 68.42% (W/L 13/6). Could tournament experience play a decisive role? It potentially favors Bondaz.
- Blaise Bicknell faces opponents with an average rank of 390.08, higher than Bondaz's average opponent rank of 450.25, suggesting Bicknell has challenged stiffer competition.
- If the match moves to a deciding set, Bondaz showcases better perseverance, winning 75% of such scenarios, in contrast to Bicknell's 36%. Will endurance dictate the match outcome? Bondaz is better positioned for a long fight.
- Evaluating all current event stats could provide additional insights into player form that may sway the prediction differently.
Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the comprehensive performance data, Mathis Bondaz displays a superior overall win rate and return game, indicting potential strength against Blaise Bicknell in this matchup. Bondaz's enhanced performance in return games, particularly against second serves, could be pivotal in crucial moments.
While Bicknell has a slight advantage in second serve points and breakpoint defense, his lower win percentage in deciding sets might leave him vulnerable if the match extends that far. The fact that Bicknell has faced stronger opponents on average might suggest readiness for high-pressure matches, yet Bondaz's tenacity in clutch moments often upsurges victory.
Based on these statistical insights, Mathis Bondaz seems the likely victor for this upcoming contest, assuming they maintain their robust form and capitalize on return opportunities as seen in prior performances.
Blaise Bicknell vs Mathis Bondaz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Bicknell vs M. Bondaz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:1:5 | Average Match Time | 2:1:5 |
| 78% (65/83) | 1st Serve % | 51% (36/71) |
| 65% (42/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 33% (6/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 51% (36/71) | Return Points Win % | 42% (35/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Bicknell Recent Matches Played
M. Bondaz Recent Matches Played

B. Bicknell vs M. Bondaz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.94% (119/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.26% (21/17) |
| 55.95% (268/211) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.22% (45/38) |
| 51.99% (2357/2177) | Games Win/Loss | 53.15% (405/357) |
| 61.54% (80/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.22% (15/8) |
| 52.05% (38/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 540 | Aces Total | 31 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 642 | Total Double Faults | 85 |
| 1:25:30 | Average Match Time | 1:12:33 |
| 426.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 375.71 |
| 65% (8104/12501) | 1st Serve % | 61% (990/1635) |
| 68% (5471/8104) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (585/990) |
| 50% (2203/4396) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (310/645) |
| 44% (504/1157) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (99/223) |
| 39% (4798/12212) | Return Points Win % | 44% (776/1754) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.37% (36/40) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 63.78% (81/46) | Futures W/L | 56.76% (21/16) |
| 57% (114/200) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (32/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 50% (34/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 82% (121/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (22/19) |
| 18% (121/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (22/3) |
| 23% (88/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (16/1) |