Blaise Bicknell vs Gabi Adrian Boitan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Apr at 04:54 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Bicknell vs G. Adrian Boitan

JAM
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ROU
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Bicknell 0 - 1 Boitan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Blaise Bicknell winning 1 and Gabi Adrian Boitan winning 2. The last match between Gabi Adrian Boitan and Blaise Bicknell was at the Sarasota Challenger, 07-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Gabi Adrian Boitan getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bicknell | 0 |
| Boitan | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Sarasota Challenger(04-07-25)
B. Bicknell vs G. A. Boitan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.94% (119-90) | Career Total W/L | 63.92% (225-127) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 3 | Titles | 8 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Bicknell vs G. A. Boitan Match Preview:
Delving into the world of competitive tennis, one finds that statistics often paint a vivid picture of what to expect from a forthcoming showdown. When it comes to second serve performances over the past six months, both Bicknell and Boitan find themselves in a dry spell, having won 0% of their points. Can we rely on these numbers to forecast the tide of their upcoming clash? Given the historical correlation between second serve success and match outcomes, this does provide some insight.
The return game stats further highlight the competitive landscape. Recent form shows both players winning 0% on their opponent’s second serves, and also on first serve returns. Does this suggest an evenly matched field? It does indeed raise intrigue about who might seize the advantage in this duel, particularly when return games often hold the keys to victory.
Under pressure, how do these contenders hold up? Bicknell has managed to save 0% of breakpoints, with Boitan reflecting a similar trend. This particular stat certainly serves as a cornerstone for those interested in live betting predictions, providing a glimpse into each player’s stress-handling capabilities.
Over the past year, performance metrics shift slightly. While Bicknell draws a blank with no wins to speak of, Boitan edges ahead, boasting a 50% match win rate. Playing preferences also reveal a divergence; on hard courts, Bicknell has a 50% win rate, contrasting with Boitan's 67% win rate on indoor hard surfaces, signaling potential comfort zones.
Let's not overlook the quality of opponents each has faced recently. Although specifics about Bicknell's opponents remain ambiguous, Boitan has competed against foes with an average rank of 219.5, which can shape perceptions about experience and readiness.
Yet, as we pivot towards the deciding set performance, neither Bicknell nor Boitan has carved a niche in winning these critical stages over the last year. When it comes to breakpoint conversion, the narrative stays steady with both players achieving a 0% conversion rate. This factor will crucially influence in-game tactics during any breakpoint situations.
Our analysis must also acknowledge the relevance of current form in any live event, as previous tournaments don't capture an on-the-day performance. For accurate predictions, insights from the ongoing event—even if elusive—could alter expectations.
Stacking up these statistics, Boitan might slightly edge ahead, primarily due to a higher win percentage and more experience with varied opponents. However, tennis is as unpredictable as it is thrilling, and statistics, while telling, don't always forecast what unfolds on the court. Yet, in making a prediction based on available data, Boitan appears to have the upper hand.
Blaise Bicknell vs Gabi Adrian Boitan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Bicknell vs G. A. Boitan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 15 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:1:42 | Average Match Time | 2:1:42 |
| 67% (55/82) | 1st Serve % | 56% (41/73) |
| 67% (37/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (28/41) |
| 41% (11/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (4/11) |
| 33% (24/73) | Return Points Win % | 41% (34/82) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Bicknell Recent Matches Played
G. A. Boitan Recent Matches Played

B. Bicknell vs G. A. Boitan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.94% (119/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.92% (225/127) |
| 55.95% (268/211) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.22% (494/300) |
| 51.99% (2357/2177) | Games Win/Loss | 55.09% (3997/3259) |
| 61.54% (80/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.38% (35/26) |
| 52.05% (38/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.18% (176/86) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.28% (14/15) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 540 | Aces Total | 801 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 642 | Total Double Faults | 1172 |
| 1:25:30 | Average Match Time | 1:28:39 |
| 424.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.71 |
| 65% (8104/12501) | 1st Serve % | 63% (12006/19169) |
| 68% (5471/8104) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (8309/12006) |
| 50% (2203/4396) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3591/7162) |
| 44% (504/1157) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (965/2121) |
| 39% (4798/12212) | Return Points Win % | 42% (8275/19546) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 47.37% (36/40) | Challenger W/L | 52.50% (42/38) |
| 63.78% (81/46) | Futures W/L | 67.54% (181/87) |
| 57% (114/200) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (225/344) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 49% (32/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (47/82) |
| 50% (34/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (51/92) |
| 82% (121/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (236/202) |
| 18% (121/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (236/32) |
| 23% (88/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (116/23) |