Billy Harris vs Ethan Quinn Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In assessing their second serve effectiveness over the past half-year, Quinn outperforms Harris by winning 47.55% of these points compared to Harris's 45.85%. This statistic holds a significant correlation with accurately predicting match outcomes.

Comparing their return games, Quinn has showcased a slightly superior performance with 45.95% of second serve return points won, as opposed to Harris's 44.77%. For first serve returns, Quinn again edges out Harris with 25.19% over 24.53%. Such stats are crucial in determining which player is favored in this head-to-head encounter.

A notable insight into these players' ability to handle pressure is revealed through their breakpoint-saving capabilities. Harris has managed to save 56.77% of break opportunities against him, whereas Quinn has achieved a similar feat 53.4% of the time. This is particularly valuable for making informed in-game betting predictions.

Examining their overall performance in the past year, Quinn leads with a match win percentage of 58.23% (46 wins, 33 losses), surpassing Harris, who has a 53.41% win rate (47 wins, 41 losses). Evaluating this statistic gives a profound overview of who might dominate their head-to-head competition.

Looking at surface preferences, Harris excels on grass with a career win percentage of 64% (29 wins, 16 losses) but does notably worse on indoor hard courts at 56% (47 wins, 37 losses). Conversely, Quinn's best surface is indoor hard, posting a 61% win rate (27 wins, 17 losses), while clay proves challenging for him, with just a 46% victory rate (11 wins, 13 losses).

Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with Harris winning 58.14% of his matches (25 wins, 18 losses) and Quinn closely matching this with a 58.33% success rate (28 wins, 20 losses). The competitive level they face is crucial, given Harris has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, averaging 208.85, versus Quinn’s average opponent rank of 231.76.

In scenarios extending to a deciding set, betting insights reveal Quinn is slightly more proficient, winning 59% of such sets, compared to Harris’s 56% over the last 12 months. This data could be particularly useful for live match predictions.

When analyzing break point conversion rates during this recent form period, Harris has shown an edge, converting 30.86% of his opportunities compared to Quinn’s 27.31%. This statistic can significantly influence in-play betting strategies when either faces crucial break points.

Conclusively, while both players present strong claims, Quinn’s edge in recent performance on key metrics like second serve and return games suggests he stands as a slight favorite to secure victory in this anticipated showdown.