Billy Harris vs Daniil Glinka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When evaluating second serve performance in the last six months, Harris has won 47.65% of points compared to Glinka's 47.69%. Is this difference significant enough to impact the match outcome? It doesn't seem so given the closeness of these statistics.
• In recent return game form, Harris has surpassed Glinka in winning 45.92% of opponent's second serve points, slightly better than Glinka’s 44.39%.
• For returns on the first serve, Glinka has an edge, gaining 25.34% compared to Harris' 24.13%.
• Under pressure, Harris has a slight advantage with a 52.17% success rate in saving breakpoints, marginally outperforming Glinka’s 50.61%.
• Considering overall performance over the last year, Harris has won 46.84% of his matches, while Glinka has a notably higher win percentage at 66.67%.
• On his favored hard surface, Harris boasts a 62% win rate, while Glinka has a higher win rate on indoor hard surfaces (I.hard) at 57%.
• Both players have experience at different levels; Harris mainly plays in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 55% win rate, whereas Glinka dominates the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits with a 66.67% win rate.
• In their only head-to-head match, Harris emerged victorious, winning two sets to Glinka’s one in a tightly contested three-set match.
• Under extreme pressure, Harris has won both the deciding set and tiebreak played in their direct encounters.
• While Harris has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 222.09, Glinka's opponents have average rankings of 427.1.
• If this match progresses to a deciding set, Glinka historically performs better with a 64% success rate, compared to Harris’ 46%.
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, Harris slightly edges out Glinka by converting 29.47% of opportunities compared to Glinka's 28.8%.

Editorial Prediction (September 7, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming match between Harris and Glinka presents an intriguing battle between two players with contrasting strengths and experiences.

While Glinka boasts a higher overall win percentage over the last year, Harris has been exposed to tougher competition. Harris also holds the psychological advantage, having won their past encounter.

Both players have slight statistical advantages in various areas, but Harris' superior performance in head-to-head pressure situations and his past victory over Glinka provide a vital edge.

Therefore, although the match is expected to be competitive, Harris is slightly favored to win, based on past performance and his comparative advantage in critical moments.