Billy Harris vs Chun Hsin Tseng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the performance of Harris and Tseng over the past six months reveals insights that can aid in predicting the outcome of their upcoming match. When it comes to second serve points, Harris has secured 45.93% of points, slightly overshadowed by Tseng, who has won 46.69%. This statistic is notably linked to accurate match predictions.

Assessing return game statistics, Harris's performance indicates a 45.05% success rate in claiming their opponent's second serve points, while Tseng has excelled with 46.76%. For first serve returns, Tseng also maintains a lead with 25.17% compared to Harris's 24.4%, an essential factor when deciphering the potential favorite in their head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, Tseng has demonstrated an edge by saving 56.3% of breakpoints as opposed to Harris’s 55.74%. Such data is pivotal for in-game betting strategies. Regarding overall performance over the last year, Harris has emerged victorious in 54.02% of their matches, while Tseng exceeds marginally with 56.41% of matches won.

Surface preferences offer additional insights, with Harris achieving a 64% win rate on grass courts compared to his weakest performance on indoor hard surfaces at 56%. In contrast, Tseng excels on clay with a 61% win rate, yet struggles on grass with no recorded victories. This distinction in surface proficiency could impact their competitive edge.

Both players predominantly participate in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K. Harris has a match win rate of 56.82% in such events, while Tseng boasts a superior 65.31% win percentage, illustrating their competence at this tournament level and indicating Tseng’s slight advantage.

The caliber of opponents faced by each player over the past 12 months also provides perspective. Harris has competed against opponents with an average rank of 210.68, contrasting with Tseng's average opposing player rank of 248.79. This discrepancy reflects differing levels of match experience and challenge.

In scenarios involving deciding sets, Tseng continues to have the upper hand, winning 60% of such sets compared to Harris’s 57%. This statistic could hold significant weight should the match progress to a tense finale.

For breakpoint conversion, Harris has managed to convert 29.71% of opportunities, eclipsing Tseng’s 27.38%. Such figures are critical for on-the-spot betting assessments when players encounter breakpoint scenarios.

Considering these statistical comparisons and relative performances, Tseng emerges as the potential victor given his consistent superiority in key metrics. Nonetheless, dynamic factors such as current form within this event can still influence the ultimate outcome.