Prediction of Betty Ann Grubb vs Pam Teeguarden Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Ann Grubb vs P. Teeguarden

Betty Ann Grubb
USA
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
3
Win
4
Played
1
Win
75
Age
74
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Pam Teeguarden
USA
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
3
Win
4
Played
1
Win
75
Age
74
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Grubb 3 - 1 Teeguarden
They have played 12 sets in total, with Betty Ann Grubb winning 8 and Pam Teeguarden winning 4. The last match between Pam Teeguarden and Betty Ann Grubb was at the Toronto, 10-08-1980, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Pam Teeguarden getting the victory 6-0 1-0 RET.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Grubb | 3 |
| Teeguarden | 1 |
Last 5 H2H Matches:
(R2) Toronto(08-10-80)
Pam Teeguarden
6
1
Betty Ann Grubb
0
0
() Atlanta Futures(03-03-80)
Betty Ann Grubb
6
6
6
Pam Teeguarden
4
7
3
(R2) Unknown Tournament(06-22-70)
Betty Ann Grubb
4
8
6
Pam Teeguarden
6
6
1
B. A. Grubb vs P. Teeguarden H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.59% (169-135) | Career Total W/L | 47.87% (315-343) |
| 2 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. A. Grubb vs P. Teeguarden Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Betty Ann Grubb has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Betty Ann Grubb, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Betty Ann Grubb has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pam Teeguarden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Betty Ann Grubb has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pam Teeguarden winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Betty Ann Grubb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 69/45), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 19/17). Pam Teeguarden has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 48/36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 54/63).
- Player level: In the last year, Betty Ann Grubb has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pam Teeguarden has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Betty Ann Grubb winning 4 times and Pam Teeguarden being victorious 1 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Betty Ann Grubb winning 8 and Pam Teeguarden winning 4.
- The last match between Betty Ann Grubb and Pam Teeguarden was at the Toronto, 10-08-1980, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Pam Teeguarden getting the victory 6-0 1-0 RET.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Betty Ann Grubb has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pam Teeguarden has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Betty Ann Grubb has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Betty Ann Grubb has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pam Teeguarden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Betty Ann Grubb vs Pam Teeguarden Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. A. Grubb vs P. Teeguarden H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 61 | Games Won | 49 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 80% (4/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Grubb 0%, Teeguarden 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Grubb 0%, Teeguarden 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Grubb 0%, Teeguarden 0%.
B. A. Grubb Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R3 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 1-0 RET | ||
P. Teeguarden Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 2-6 7-5 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||

B. A. Grubb vs P. Teeguarden Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.59% (169/135) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.87% (315/343) |
| 54.41% (358/300) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.86% (729/763) |
| 51.87% (3124/2899) | Games Win/Loss | 50.06% (6862/6846) |
| 60.53% (69/45) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.32% (72/74) |
| 52.78% (19/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.15% (54/63) |
| 39.58% (19/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.62% (63/96) |
| 60.47% (26/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (48/36) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 108.6 |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 57.14% (12/9) |
| 83.33% (10/2) | Challenger W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 45.45% (20/24) | Futures W/L | 49.64% (68/69) |
| 56% (164/292) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (307/646) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 61% (43/71) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (78/191) |
| 91% (156/142) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (325/266) |
| 9% (156/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (325/59) |
| 17% (138/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (326/42) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 23 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 01:30 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 04:00 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 01:30 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
11:10
H2H 0-0
13:00
H2H 0-0
14:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Hersonissos 7 Challenger
Greece
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Ribeirao Preto
Brazil
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal