Prediction of Betsy Nagelsen vs Catrin Jexell Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Nagelsen vs C. Jexell

Betsy Nagelsen

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

185

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Catrin Jexell

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

185

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Nagelsen 1 - 0 Jexell

They have played 2 sets in total, with Betsy Nagelsen winning 2 and Catrin Jexell winning 0. The last match between Betsy Nagelsen and Catrin Jexell was at the Indianapolis 1, 04-03-1985, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Betsy Nagelsen getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Nagelsen	1
Jexell	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Indianapolis 1(03-04-85)

Stats

Betsy Nagelsen

Catrin Jexell

B. Nagelsen vs C. Jexell H2H Profile

B. Nagelsen	Stats	C. Jexell
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.97% (356-371)	Career Total W/L	51.19% (129-123)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Nagelsen vs C. Jexell Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Catrin Jexell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Betsy Nagelsen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Catrin Jexell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Betsy Nagelsen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Catrin Jexell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Catrin Jexell winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Betsy Nagelsen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 89/59), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 90/108). Catrin Jexell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 45/24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 6/11).
Player level: In the last year, Betsy Nagelsen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Catrin Jexell has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Betsy Nagelsen winning 1 times and Catrin Jexell being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Betsy Nagelsen winning 2 and Catrin Jexell winning 0.
The last match between Betsy Nagelsen and Catrin Jexell was at the Indianapolis 1, 04-03-1985, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Betsy Nagelsen getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Betsy Nagelsen has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Catrin Jexell has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Catrin Jexell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Betsy Nagelsen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Catrin Jexell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Betsy Nagelsen vs Catrin Jexell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Nagelsen vs C. Jexell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Nagelsen	Stats	C. Jexell
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Nagelsen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indian Wells - 21-02-1994
R3 Natalia ZverevaN. Zvereva	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Budapest - 18-10-1993
Q1 Asa CarlssonA. Carlsson	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Montpellier - 11-10-1993
R3 Natalia BaudoneN. Baudone	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 21-06-1993
Q2 Sophie AmiachS. Amiach	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Q1 Alison SmithA. Smith	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Jexell Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Ronneby - 24-06-1991
Q1 Mirja WallmarkM. Wallmark	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
Q2 Viviana ValdovinosV. Valdovinos	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
ITF Caserta - 11-04-1988
Q2 Veronika MartinekV. Martinek	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 14-03-1988
Q1 Clare WoodC. Wood	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
Q2 Jeri IngramJ. Ingram	W	6-3 6-0	Stats

View All

B. Nagelsen vs C. Jexell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Nagelsen	Stats	C. Jexell
48.97% (356/371)	YTD Win/Loss	51.19% (129/123)
49.59% (850/864)	Sets Win/Loss	50.18% (279/277)
49.70% (7950/8046)	Games Win/Loss	50.18% (2525/2507)
45.45% (90/108)	Hard Win/Loss	65.22% (45/24)
46.81% (44/50)	Clay Win/Loss	45.33% (34/41)
39.53% (51/78)	Indoor Hard W/L	54.05% (20/17)
60.14% (89/59)	Grass Win/Loss	35.29% (6/11)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
203.59	Average Opponent Rank	262.62
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	50.00% (1/1)
80.77% (21/5)	Challenger W/L	62.50% (35/21)
37.74% (40/66)	Futures W/L	50.00% (22/22)
49% (348/712)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (125/248)
100% (3/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
56% (5/9)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (1/2)
47% (128/273)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (31/60)
81% (348/281)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (127/112)
19% (348/67)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (127/15)
19% (373/72)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (121/13)