Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Ena Shibahara Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mattek-Sands vs Shibahara analysis and find out who is favored!
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Ena Shibahara Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mattek-Sands has won 22.73% of points on his second serve, while Shibahara has won 52.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mattek-Sands, in recent form, has won 51.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shibahara has won 53.84%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.46% and 38.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mattek-Sands has saved 22.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shibahara has saved 56.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mattek-Sands has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Shibahara winning 66.67% (W/L 32/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mattek-Sands has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 107/ 82), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 180/ 173). Shibahara has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Mattek-Sands has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Shibahara has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.17% of matches (W/L 30/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mattek-Sands winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mattek-Sands winning 2 and Shibahara winning 1. The last match between Mattek-Sands and Shibahara was at the Tennis in the Land - Cleveland, 23-08-2021, First, Hard with Bethanie Mattek-Sands getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mattek-Sands and Shibahara have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mattek-Sands winning 1 times and Shibahara 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mattek-Sands winning 0, and Shibahara 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mattek-Sands has played against opponents with an average rank of 81 while Shibahara has played against players with an average rank of 188.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mattek-Sands has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shibahara has won 79% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mattek-Sands has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shibahara has converted 46.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mattek-Sands 1 - 0 Shibahara
665
Rank
30
High
39
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
349
Rank
349
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
53% (356-313)
Career Total W/L
58% (107-79)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
81% (21-5)
$1,687,071
Career Prize Money
$28,143
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mattek-Sands VS Shibahara H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Ena Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (51/86) | 48% (38/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (35/51) | 71% (27/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (20/35) | 49% (20/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (32/79) | 36% (31/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mattek-Sands VS Shibahara H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Ena Shibahara
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Ena Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 81% (21/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 72% (43/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 25% (4/12) | 57% (329/245) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 81% (21/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 104 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:5 | 1:44:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162 | 180.46 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (20/42) | 64% (1160/1807) |
| 1st Serve W% | 35% (7/20) | 68% (794/1160) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 23% (5/22) | 54% (350/647) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (3/9) | 47% (101/217) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (31/67) | 44% (827/1888) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 81% (21/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 81% (21/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 95% (21/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 5% (21/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Bethanie Mattek-Sands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
39%
(
26 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danka Kovinic
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Xiaodi You
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Alycia Parks
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shuai Zhang
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
73 of
123)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
123)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Ena Shibahara
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Aoi Ito
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
86 of
122)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
54 of
86)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Destanee Aiava
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Ena Shibahara
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Iva Jovic
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maria Mateas
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maria Kononova
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Jessica Failla
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mattek-Sands Vs Shibahara Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
