Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bernard Tomic vs Samuel Groth Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tomic vs Groth analysis and find out who is favored!
Bernard Tomic vs Samuel Groth Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tomic has won 51.72% of points on his second serve, while Groth has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tomic, in recent form, has won 50.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Groth has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tomic has saved 65.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Groth has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tomic has won 58.97% of matches played (W/L 46/ 32), with Groth winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tomic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 256/ 157), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 48/ 75). Groth has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 85/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 199/ 177).
- Player level: In the last year, Tomic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.67% of matches (W/L 31/ 29), where as Groth has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tomic winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tomic winning 5 and Groth winning 0. The last match between Tomic and Groth was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 23-01-2015, Third, Hard with Bernard Tomic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tomic and Groth have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tomic winning 0 times and Groth 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Tomic winning 2, and Groth 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tomic has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.22 while Groth has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tomic has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Groth has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tomic has converted 45.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Groth has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tomic 2 - 0 Groth
256
Rank
17
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
53
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
56% (398-317)
Career Total W/L
57% (387-296)
61% (17-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,883,920
Career Prize Money
$650,305
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Bernard Tomic | Samuel Groth |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 0 |
| Games Won | 32 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 37 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:15 | 1:29:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (110/158) | 62% (100/161) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (90/110) | 79% (79/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (33/48) | 52% (32/61) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (50/161) | 22% (35/158) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(8) 6-3 |
Stats 
Bernard Tomic
Player
Samuel Groth
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
9
Aces
17
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
49 of
60)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Samuel Groth
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
21%
(
14 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bernard Tomic | Samuel Groth |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (17/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (36/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (311/270) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 155 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:19 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 305.96 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1044/1796) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (774/1044) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (384/752) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (67/153) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (641/1712) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (17/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Bernard Tomic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Bernard Tomic
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
40%
(
2 of
5)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
5
Total Points Won
6
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Bernard Tomic
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Bernard Tomic
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Skander Mansouri
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
5
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
9
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
110)
113
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
12
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Omar Jasika
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Bernard Tomic
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
48
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Valentin Vacherot
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Masjuan Ginel
Player
Bernard Tomic
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Samuel Groth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
46%
(
12 of
26)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Manuel Sanchez
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
13
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
8
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
11%
(
6 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Samuel Groth
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomic Vs Groth Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
