Bernard Tomic vs Michael Zheng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In terms of second serve performance in the last six months, Tomic has the upper hand, winning 47.23% of these points compared to Zheng's 40.59%.
• For return games, Tomic again outdoes Zheng recently, winning 46.14% of opponents' second serve points, while Zheng has managed 39.47%. Does this indicate Tomic is more aggressive on returns?
• When it comes to returning first serves, both players are close, with Zheng at 26.1% and Tomic at 25.09%.
• An analysis under pressure reveals Tomic has saved a slightly higher percentage of breakpoints at 55.47%, compared to Zheng's 54.39%, making Tomic marginally stronger in clutch moments.
• Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Zheng boasts a higher win percentage at 70.37%, whereas Tomic's rate stands at 54.41%. Could this suggest Zheng's consistency over time?
• Both players have their best surface win percentages on Hard courts, each at 62%. However, Zheng struggles more on I. Hard with a 56% win rate, while Tomic's weakness is on Clay with a 42% win rate.
• At the Challengers/ITF level, Zheng achieved a higher success rate of 71.43% versus Tomic's 53.57%. Does this highlight Zheng's effectiveness in smaller events?
• In direct head-to-head encounters, Tomic leads, having won the only match played against Zheng, and maintaining a 2-1 lead in sets.
• Under extreme pressure, Tomic has excelled in deciding sets, winning 63% over the past year compared to Zheng's 25%.
• The quality of opponents faced by Tomic over the past year has been higher, with an average rank of 290.97, while Zheng's opponents averaged a rank of 392.96.
• Break point conversion heavily favors Tomic as well; he's converted 32.37% of break opportunities, while Zheng has only managed 25.53%.

Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match nears, Tomic appears to hold the edge over Zheng in several critical statistical categories. His superior performance in second serve points and ability to convert break points suggest an advantage in tactical opportunities.

Though Zheng has shown excellent overall match performance and consistency, Tomic's experience in handling opponents of higher ranks and his proficiency in deciding sets and clutch situations present compelling arguments in his favor.

Based on these facets, Tomic is most likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming encounter against Zheng.