Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Berfu Cengiz vs Anna Ureke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cengiz vs Ureke analysis and find out who is favored!
Berfu Cengiz vs Anna Ureke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cengiz has won 42.42% of points on his second serve, while Ureke has won 41.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cengiz, in recent form, has won 60.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ureke has won 65.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.36% and 46.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cengiz has saved 49.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ureke has saved 48.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cengiz has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 27/ 30), with Ureke winning 65.22% (W/L 15/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 88/ 53), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61). Ureke has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 26/ 28), where as Ureke has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 12/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cengiz winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cengiz winning 2 and Ureke winning 1. The last match between Cengiz and Ureke was at the W60 Bodrum, 17-05-2023, First, Clay with Berfu Cengiz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cengiz and Ureke have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cengiz winning 1 times and Ureke 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cengiz winning 0, and Ureke 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cengiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 319.32 while Ureke has played against players with an average rank of 151.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cengiz has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ureke has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cengiz has converted 48.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ureke has converted 57.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cengiz 1 - 0 Ureke
323
Rank
228
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
791
Rank
631
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
57% (220-164)
Career Total W/L
55% (132-109)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
78% (7-2)
$2,824
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Anna Ureke |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 12 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (53/86) | 71% (55/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (29/53) | 62% (34/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (16/33) | 30% (7/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (37/78) | 48% (41/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Anna Ureke
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Anna Ureke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 78% (7/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (21/20) | 71% (15/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (203/187) | 59% (107/74) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 78% (7/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:46:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 324.35 | 140 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (784/1177) | 79% (417/527) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (477/784) | 56% (232/417) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (174/393) | 43% (47/110) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (76/154) | 56% (48/86) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (585/1272) | 54% (282/522) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 67% (4/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 78% (7/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (10/4) | 67% (3/2) |
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Berfu Cengiz
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Radka Zelnickova
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Nika Bumbak
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Berfu Cengiz
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Julia Avdeeva
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
119)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
17
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
60%
(
12 of
20)
Break Points Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
53%
(
56 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
67 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Berfu Cengiz
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Berfu Cengiz
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
13
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
55 of
80)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Ureke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Ashmitha Easwaramurthi
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
79%
(
49 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Edda Mamedova
80%
(
70 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
111)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
55%
(
48 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
65 of
111)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Anna Ureke
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
83%
(
62 of
75)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
1-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Gio Jang
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
33 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Anna Ureke
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Nika Radisic
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Fiona Ganz
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diletta Cherubini
Player
Anna Ureke
66%
(
80 of
122)
1st Serve %
74%
(
90 of
122)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
52 of
90)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
54 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
122)
127
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cengiz Vs Ureke Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Berfu Cengiz
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Anna Ureke
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
