Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Berfu Cengiz vs Anastasia Zakharova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cengiz vs Zakharova analysis and find out who is favored!
Berfu Cengiz vs Anastasia Zakharova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cengiz has won 44.19% of points on his second serve, while Zakharova has won 46.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cengiz, in recent form, has won 59.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zakharova has won 57.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.95% and 40.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cengiz has saved 49.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zakharova has saved 50.87% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cengiz has won 47.46% of matches played (W/L 28/ 31), with Zakharova winning 67.65% (W/L 46/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 89/ 54), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61). Zakharova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 106/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.21% of matches (W/L 27/ 29), where as Zakharova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.91% of matches (W/L 39/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cengiz winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Cengiz winning 0 and Zakharova winning 4. The last match between Cengiz and Zakharova was at the W25 Tbilisi, 10-06-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Anastasia Zakharova getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cengiz and Zakharova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cengiz winning 0 times and Zakharova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cengiz winning 0, and Zakharova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cengiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.07 while Zakharova has played against players with an average rank of 269.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cengiz has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zakharova has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cengiz has converted 46.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zakharova has converted 51.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cengiz 0 - 2 Zakharova
303
Rank
228
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
155
Rank
133
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (221-165)
Career Total W/L
67% (218-108)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
53% (8-7)
$2,824
Career Prize Money
$325,457
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Anastasia Zakharova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 13 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (75/117) | 61% (80/132) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 48% (36/75) | 59% (47/80) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (15/42) | 54% (28/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 37% (7/19) | 62% (13/21) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (57/132) | 56% (66/117) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Berfu Cengiz
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Berfu Cengiz
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Anastasia Zakharova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 53% (8/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (24/23) | 51% (19/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (226/216) | 50% (170/169) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 64% (7/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:9 | 1:53:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 344.79 | 330.93 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (880/1327) | 62% (696/1125) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (529/880) | 62% (430/696) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (206/447) | 46% (199/429) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (83/176) | 43% (65/151) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (662/1461) | 46% (529/1162) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (9/9) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 53% (8/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 45% (11/5) | 29% (7/2) |
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Berfu Cengiz
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Kayla Day
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Berfu Cengiz
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Radka Zelnickova
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Nika Bumbak
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Berfu Cengiz
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Julia Avdeeva
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
119)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
17
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
60%
(
12 of
20)
Break Points Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
53%
(
56 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
67 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Anastasia Zakharova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
4
Aces
0
17
Double Faults
7
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
43%
(
29 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
0
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
40%
(
29 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
5
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
8
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Korneeva
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
57 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
113)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
8
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
113)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
67%
(
79 of
118)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
114)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
31%
(
12 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
58 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Kaja Juvan
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Yulia Putintseva
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cengiz Vs Zakharova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
