Ben Patael vs Milen Ianakiev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Patael vs Ianakiev analysis and find out who is favored!
Ben Patael vs Milen Ianakiev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patael has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ianakiev has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patael, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ianakiev has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patael has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ianakiev has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patael has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 2/ 4), with Ianakiev winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16). Ianakiev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 23/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 62/ 66).
- Player level: In the last year, Patael has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4), where as Ianakiev has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Patael winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Patael winning 2 and Ianakiev winning 1. The last match between Patael and Ianakiev was at the Israel F8, 25-05-2016, Second, Hard with Ben Patael getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Patael and Ianakiev have played a deciding set 1 times, with Patael winning 1 times and Ianakiev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Patael winning 0, and Ianakiev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patael has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ianakiev has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patael has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ianakiev has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patael has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ianakiev has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Patael 1 - 0 Ianakiev
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
7
Minor
809
Rank
379
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (256-181)
Career Total W/L
49% (85-89)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ben Patael | Milen Ianakiev |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 15 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (56/93) | 60% (52/87) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (42/56) | 69% (36/52) |
2nd Serve Win% | 49% (18/37) | 54% (19/35) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 20% (2/10) |
Return Points W% | 37% (32/87) | 35% (33/93) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Ben Patael
Player
Milen Ianakiev
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
8
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ben Patael | Milen Ianakiev |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Milen Ianakiev Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Milen Ianakiev
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milen Ianakiev
Player
Rashed Nawaf
82%
(
65 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Milen Ianakiev
Player
Mohammed Abdulla
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Drew Baird
Player
Milen Ianakiev
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Sizya Ernest Kivanda
Player
Milen Ianakiev
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more