Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ben Patael vs Mikhail Elgin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Patael vs Elgin analysis and find out who is favored!
Ben Patael vs Mikhail Elgin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patael has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Elgin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patael, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Elgin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patael has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elgin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patael has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 2/ 4), with Elgin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16). Elgin has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 79/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Patael has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4), where as Elgin has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Patael winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Patael winning 2 and Elgin winning 1. The last match between Patael and Elgin was at the M25 Aktobe, 14-02-2019, Second, I.hard with Ben Patael getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Patael and Elgin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Patael winning 0 times and Elgin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Patael winning 1, and Elgin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patael has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Elgin has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patael has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elgin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patael has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elgin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Patael 1 - 0 Elgin
809
Rank
379
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
123
High
42
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
59% (256-181)
Career Total W/L
56% (328-260)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$50,625
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ben Patael | Mikhail Elgin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:26:0 | 2:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (67/98) | 61% (60/98) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (51/67) | 80% (48/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (15/31) | 45% (17/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 7% (1/14) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (33/98) | 33% (32/98) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(2) 5-2 ret. |
Stats 
Ben Patael
Player
Mikhail Elgin
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
12
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
48 of
60)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
33%
(
32 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ben Patael | Mikhail Elgin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Mikhail Elgin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Szymon Walkow
Player
Mikhail Elgin
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Mikhail Elgin
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Mikhail Elgin
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
12
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
48 of
60)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
33%
(
32 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(2) 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mikhail Elgin
Player
Saida'Lo Saidkarimov
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Elgin
Player
Timur Maulenov
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
9
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
22%
(
15 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 7-6(1) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arjun Kadhe
Player
Mikhail Elgin
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Youssef Hossam
Player
Mikhail Elgin
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
89)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Elgin
Player
Ramazan Nureev
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Menezes
Player
Mikhail Elgin
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Patael Vs Elgin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
