Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ben Patael vs Igor Smilansky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Patael vs Smilansky analysis and find out who is favored!
Ben Patael vs Igor Smilansky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patael has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Smilansky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patael, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Smilansky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patael has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smilansky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patael has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 2/ 4), with Smilansky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16). Smilansky has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 130/ 79), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Patael has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4), where as Smilansky has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Patael winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Patael winning 4 and Smilansky winning 3. The last match between Patael and Smilansky was at the Israel F12 (Herzlia), 07-10-2018, Final, Hard with Ben Patael getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Patael and Smilansky have played a deciding set 1 times, with Patael winning 1 times and Smilansky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Patael winning 0, and Smilansky 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patael has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Smilansky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patael has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smilansky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patael has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smilansky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Patael 2 - 1 Smilansky
809
Rank
379
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
451
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
59% (256-181)
Career Total W/L
60% (142-94)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ben Patael | Igor Smilansky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 36 | 34 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:40 | 2:1:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (166/248) | 59% (131/222) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (112/166) | 73% (96/131) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (47/82) | 54% (49/91) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 25% (6/24) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (77/222) | 36% (89/248) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Ben Patael
Player
Igor Smilansky
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(11) |
Stats
Igor Smilansky
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Igor Smilansky
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ben Patael | Igor Smilansky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Igor Smilansky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Patael Vs Smilansky Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
