Prediction of Belmar Gunderson vs Leslie Sparling Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Gunderson vs L. Sparling

Belmar Gunderson

USA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Leslie Sparling

CAN

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Gunderson 3 - 0 Sparling

They have played 6 sets in total, with Belmar Gunderson winning 6 and Leslie Sparling winning 0. The last match between Belmar Gunderson and Leslie Sparling was at the Boston, 23-02-1964, Round: , Surface: Carpet, with Belmar Gunderson getting the victory 7-5 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gunderson	3
Sparling	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

() Boston(02-23-64)

Stats

Belmar Gunderson

Leslie Sparling

() Tampa(01-02-61)

Stats

Belmar Gunderson

Leslie Sparling

(R2) Haverford(07-21-58)

Stats

Belmar Gunderson

Leslie Sparling

B. Gunderson vs L. Sparling H2H Profile

B. Gunderson	Stats	L. Sparling
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
53.54% (106-92)	Career Total W/L	23.33% (14-46)
1	Clay	0
1	Grass	0
1	Indoor	0
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Gunderson vs L. Sparling Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Belmar Gunderson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Leslie Sparling has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Belmar Gunderson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Leslie Sparling has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Belmar Gunderson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leslie Sparling has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Belmar Gunderson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Leslie Sparling winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Belmar Gunderson has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 58% (W/L 7/5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 9/13). Leslie Sparling has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 58% (W/L 5/14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
Player level: In the last year, Belmar Gunderson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Leslie Sparling has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Belmar Gunderson winning 3 times and Leslie Sparling being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Belmar Gunderson winning 6 and Leslie Sparling winning 0.
The last match between Belmar Gunderson and Leslie Sparling was at the Boston, 23-02-1964, Round: , Surface: Carpet, with Belmar Gunderson getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Belmar Gunderson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Leslie Sparling has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Belmar Gunderson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leslie Sparling has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Belmar Gunderson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leslie Sparling has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Matchstat.com indicated that Belmar Gunderson has 32.92 % Probability of win, Leslie Sparling 67.08 %.

Belmar Gunderson vs Leslie Sparling Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Gunderson vs L. Sparling H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Gunderson	Stats	L. Sparling
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	0
37	Games Won	17
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Gunderson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
US National Championships - 03-09-1965
R2 Francoise DurrF. Durr	L	5-7 7-5 6-2	Stats
Manchester-On-Sea - 16-08-1965
Carol AucampC. Aucamp	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R4 Nell TrumanN. Truman	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
R3 Mimi HenreidM. Henreid	W	3-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Locust Valley - 03-08-1965
R3 Barbara MenoffB. Menoff	W	6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

L. Sparling Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Oakville - 20-06-1966
F Louise BrownL. Brown	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
SF Jane OharaJ. Ohara	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Toronto - 09-08-1965
R4 Vicky BernerV. Berner	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Toronto Intl - 02-08-1965
R3 Sara Mae TurberS. Mae	W	6-3 1-6 6-1	Stats
Alice TymA. Tym	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

B. Gunderson vs L. Sparling Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Gunderson	Stats	L. Sparling
53.54% (106/92)	YTD Win/Loss	23.33% (14/46)
52.85% (232/207)	Sets Win/Loss	26.98% (34/92)
51.42% (2014/1903)	Games Win/Loss	40.46% (460/677)
40.91% (9/13)	Clay Win/Loss	16.67% (5/25)
71.43% (5/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.14% (4/3)
54.14% (85/72)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/4)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0.22	Average Opponent Rank	0
46.67% (14/16)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
52% (100/191)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	25% (14/57)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
45% (23/51)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (5/11)
85% (109/93)	1st Set Won, Won Match	69% (16/11)
15% (109/16)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	31% (16/5)
12% (86/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	7% (42/3)