Ayumi Koshiishi vs Elena Micic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

A. Koshiishi vs E. Micic

Ayumi Koshiishi
Ayumi Koshiishi

Flag JPN JPN

l
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
Elena Micic
Elena Micic

Flag AUS AUS

l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

25
Age
21
-
Height
-
434
C. Rank
401
367
Best Rank
349
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-To-Head: Koshiishi 1 - 0 Micic

They have played 3 sets in total, with Ayumi Koshiishi winning 2 and Elena Micic winning 1. The last match between Ayumi Koshiishi and Elena Micic was at the W35 Burnie, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ayumi Koshiishi getting the victory 5-7 6-3 6-1.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Koshiishi1
Micic0
Last H2H Matches:

(R1W35 Burnie(02-18-25)

Hard
JPN Flag
Ayumi Koshiishi
5
6
6
AUS Flag
Elena Micic
7
3
1

A. Koshiishi vs E. Micic H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
62.28% (289-175)Career Total W/L49.11% (83-86)
1Hard0
8Titles0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

A. Koshiishi vs E. Micic Match Preview

Recent Form Analysis: In their most recent performances over the past six months, Koshiishi has displayed a commendable second serve success rate, emerging victorious in 46.45% of points. Contrastingly, Micic has slightly surpassed Koshiishi with a 47.79% success rate on their second serve. It is worth noting that this statistical observation bears a significant correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.

Return Game Statistics: Analyzing return game statistics reveals that in recent form, Koshiishi has outshined their opponents on second serve points, winning an impressive 58.93% of them. Meanwhile, Micic has recorded a respectable rate of 56.99%. When focusing on first serve returns, Koshiishi has demonstrated a success rate of 45.93%, whereas Micic has achieved a slightly lower rate of 37.54%. These statistics further contribute to identifying the favored player in this head-to-head matchup, as there is a substantial correlation between these figures and the outcome of the game.

Under Pressure Assessment: Examining their ability to handle pressure situations, Koshiishi has illustrated their resilience by saving 52.11% of breakpoints in recent form. Comparatively, Micic has successfully saved 58.47% of breakpoints. This particular statistic is particularly valuable for making predictions related to in-game betting scenarios.

Performance Overview: Throughout the course of the previous year, Koshiishi has masterfully won 61.25% of their matches, boasting an impressive win-loss record of 49 wins to 31 losses. Micic, on the other hand, has exhibited commendable performance by securing victory in 62.9% of matches, with a win-loss record of 39 wins to 23 losses. These overall results provide us with an insightful overview to predict the potential outcome of their face-off.

Surface Specialization: Taking into account the preferred playing surfaces of both players, it is evident that Koshiishi's proficiency shines on the hard courts, as they have achieved a formidable 65% win rate (197 wins to 105 losses). Comparatively, Koshiishi's performance on indoor hard courts shows a lower success rate of 57% (21 wins to 16 losses). Micic, on the other hand, has showcased their prowess on hard courts, achieving a commendable win rate of 57% (62 wins to 47 losses). Conversely, Micic's performance on clay courts has been less exceptional, with a win rate of 18% (4 wins to 18 losses).

Player Evaluation: Evaluating the recent matches of the past year, Koshiishi has primarily competed in Challengers and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Impressively, they have emerged victorious in 58.21% of these matches, accumulating a win-loss record of 39 wins to 28 losses. In contrast, Micic has predominantly participated in the same category of tournaments, claiming victory in 62.96% of matches (34 wins to 20 losses). When comparing the statistics between these players to determine the favorite, it is crucial to consider the significance of the event level at which they have been competing.

Opponent Quality Assessment: Over the previous 12 months, Koshiishi has frequently encountered opponents with an average rank of 396.23. In contrast, Micic has faced players with an average rank of 377.61. These statistics shed light on the caliber of opponents each player has been confronted with, thereby influencing their overall performance.

Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, if the match enters a decisive set, Koshiishi has demonstrated praiseworthy proficiency by winning 63% of deciding sets throughout the past year. In comparison, Micic has showcased an outstanding 85% success rate in all matches played on the professional tour. These statistics provide valuable insights for those seeking to make informed in-game predictions.

Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While relying on past player performances can prove useful in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to consider the current event statistics for an indication of players' current form. To acquire a more accurate assessment of players' current capabilities, it is advisable to refer to the section below (eventStats) if they have already participated in matches within the ongoing tournament. Additionally, certain players may exhibit enhanced performances at specific events, further emphasizing the significance of such considerations in determining the anticipated outcome.

Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Koshiishi has impressively capitalized on 51.96% of breakpoint opportunities, showcasing their ability to convert crucial moments into their favor. Conversely, Micic has demonstrated a marginally lower conversion rate of 48.63% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serves. This statistic assumes a pivotal role in providing valuable in-game live betting tips whenever either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.

If you possess an interest in predictive models for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Please note: This content caters to enthusiasts with a profound appreciation for statistical analyses.)

Ayumi Koshiishi vs Elena Micic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Koshiishi vs E. Micic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won1
17Games Won11
6Aces (Total)2
6Total Double Faults8
2:20:23Avg. Match Time2:20:23
63% (64/101)1st Serve %67% (60/90)
66% (42/64)1st Serve Win %53% (32/60)
35% (13/37)2nd Serve Win %40% (12/30)
80% (8/10)Break Pts Won %42% (5/12)
51% (46/90)Return Pts Won %46% (46/101)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won → Match Won0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won → Match Lost100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Lost → Match Won0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Koshiishi 43%, Micic 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Koshiishi 57%, Micic 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Koshiishi 47%, Micic 52%.

A. Koshiishi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW100 Incheon - 22-09-2025

R1

JPNM. Matsuda
L
6-4 4-6 6-2
I.hardW35 Shenyang - 15-09-2025

R2

BLRA. Falei
L
6-1 6-1

R1

CHNY. Yang
W
6-1 6-3
HardW50 Guiyang - 08-09-2025

R2

CHNY. Ren
L
2-6 6-4 6-3

R1

USAK. Liu
W
7-6(8) 6-2

E. Micic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW35 Wagga Wagga - 15-09-2025

R1

AUSL. Khan
L
6-4 6-2
HardW35 Wagga Wagga - 08-09-2025

SF

AUST. Preston
L
2-6 6-1 6-2

QF

JPNH. Arakawa
W
2-6 6-4 6-1

R1

NZLS. Situe
W
6-3 7-6(5)

R2

AUSN. Mckenzie
W
6-4 6-4
banner

A. Koshiishi vs E. Micic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
62.28% (289/175)YTD Win/Loss49.11% (83/86)
60.84% (626/403)Sets Win/Loss48.56% (186/197)
55.03% (5017/4100)Games Win/Loss49.71% (1715/1735)
63.74% (218/124)Hard Win/Loss53.33% (72/63)
63.41% (26/15)Clay Win/Loss18.18% (4/18)
55.56% (45/36)Indoor Hard W/L50.00% (1/1)
0% (0/0)Grass Win/Loss60.00% (6/4)
0.18Aces Per Game0.16
807Aces Total268
0.3Double Faults Per Game0.46
1311Total Double Faults774
1:15:11Average Match Time1:24:54
508.94Average Opponent Rank367.26
60% (13265/22113)1st Serve %66% (6513/9937)
62% (8163/13265)1st Serve Win %59% (3828/6513)
45% (3994/8847)2nd Serve Win %43% (1456/3424)
50% (1503/3027)Break Points Won % (Total)48% (581/1201)
48% (10559/22005)Return Points Win %46% (4464/9796)
0% (0/0)Slam W/L66.67% (2/1)
0% (0/0)Main Tour W/L0.00% (0/1)
52.87% (138/123)Challenger W/L52.14% (73/67)
74.38% (151/52)Futures W/L32.00% (8/17)
62% (282/454)Best of 3 Sets Win %49% (82/168)
100% (2/2)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (1/1)
57% (43/76)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)64% (14/22)
50% (54/107)Deciding Set Win %55% (24/44)
90% (287/259)1st Set Won, Won Match85% (79/67)
9% (287/27)1st Set Won, Lost Match15% (79/12)
17% (177/30)1st Set Lost, Won Match18% (90/16)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?