Axel Nefve vs Nathan Cox Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 07:08 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nefve vs N. Cox

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Nefve 0 - 1 Cox
They have played 3 sets in total, with Axel Nefve winning 1 and Nathan Cox winning 2. The last match between Nathan Cox and Axel Nefve was at the M25 Columbus, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Nathan Cox getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nefve | 0 |
| Cox | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Columbus(11-12-25)
A. Nefve vs N. Cox H2H Profile
A. Nefve vs N. Cox Match Preview:
- Axel Nefve has a slight edge in second serve performance over the last six months, winning 43.80% of points compared to Nathan Cox's 43.46%. Could this be a deciding factor?
- In return games, Nefve edges Cox on opponent's second serve points at 50.15% versus 49.52%, and has a significant advantage on first serve returns with 24.42% compared to 19.92%.
- Despite Nefve's return game strengths, Nathan Cox shows superior breakpoint-saving ability, stopping 63.08% of break points faced against Nefve's 56.71%.
- In the last year, Cox demonstrates higher overall match success with a 66.67% win rate, while Nefve trails at 51.67%.
- Surface preference shows Nefve excelling on Grass (67%), whereas Cox performs best on indoor hard courts (67%). Could this influence the match outcome?
- Both players have primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, yet Cox has a higher winning percentage (66.67%) compared to Nefve (53.70%).
- Nefve has faced less challenging opponents recently, with an average rank of 406.75, whereas Cox has taken on stronger opponents with a mean rank of 238.39.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Cox’s performance gives him the upper hand, having won 67% of these sets versus Nefve’s 46%.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Cox holds a slight edge, converting 32.00% compared to Nefve's 31.58%.
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
Axel Nefve has displayed commendable abilities in his second serve and return game statistics, which remains a crucial aspect in determining match outcomes. His first serve return success rate could provide advantages during the match.
Conversely, Nathan Cox has manifested a stronger overall performance in recent competitions, both in terms of win percentage and ability to save break points. His effectiveness in critical moments suggests an upper hand, particularly if the match extends to a deciding set.
Considering current trends and surface preferences, Cox's experience against higher-ranked players and his superior decisive-set record indicate he may carry the edge.
Thus, based on the provided statistics and past performance trends, Nathan Cox is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Axel Nefve vs Nathan Cox Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Nefve vs N. Cox H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 14 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:13:14 | Average Match Time | 2:13:14 |
| 73% (58/80) | 1st Serve % | 59% (51/87) |
| 62% (36/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (35/51) |
| 41% (9/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 43% (37/87) | Return Points Win % | 44% (35/80) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Nefve Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
N. Cox Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||

A. Nefve vs N. Cox Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.33% (113/95) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.00% (13/7) |
| 55.32% (260/210) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.42% (29/19) |
| 53.11% (2325/2053) | Games Win/Loss | 50.11% (230/229) |
| 52.29% (57/52) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 56.94% (41/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 54.17% (13/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 566 | Aces Total | 49 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 612 | Total Double Faults | 52 |
| 1:14:16 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 345.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 301.75 |
| 61% (5935/9676) | 1st Serve % | 51% (333/658) |
| 69% (4070/5935) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (230/333) |
| 45% (1695/3741) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (154/325) |
| 42% (419/996) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (23/58) |
| 40% (3921/9717) | Return Points Win % | 41% (253/622) |
| 20.00% (3/12) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.99% (110/83) | Futures W/L | 65.00% (13/7) |
| 55% (112/204) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (13/20) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (24/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (4/4) |
| 39% (21/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 82% (128/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (12/11) |
| 17% (128/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (12/1) |
| 10% (80/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (8/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
