Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Attila Balazs vs Jordi Samper-Montana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Balazs vs Samper-Montana analysis and find out who is favored!
Attila Balazs vs Jordi Samper-Montana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Balazs has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Balazs, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Balazs has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samper-Montana has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Balazs has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 3), with Samper-Montana winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Balazs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 408/ 181), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 6/ 18). Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Balazs has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Samper-Montana has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Balazs winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Balazs winning 4 and Samper-Montana winning 0. The last match between Balazs and Samper-Montana was at the Turkey F6 (Antalya), 17-02-2018, Semifinals, Hard with Attila Balazs getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Balazs and Samper-Montana have played a deciding set 0 times, with Balazs winning 0 times and Samper-Montana 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Balazs winning 0, and Samper-Montana 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Balazs has played against opponents with an average rank of 70 while Samper-Montana has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Balazs has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samper-Montana has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Balazs has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samper-Montana has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Balazs 2 - 0 Samper-Montana
747
Rank
76
High
35
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
67% (448-223)
Career Total W/L
56% (442-346)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$332,020
Career Prize Money
$84,925
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Balazs VS Samper-Montana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Attila Balazs | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:24 | 1:9:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (57/86) | 59% (58/98) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (42/57) | 53% (31/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (16/29) | 28% (11/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (10/18) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (56/98) | 33% (28/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Balazs VS Samper-Montana H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Attila Balazs
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Attila Balazs
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Attila Balazs | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Attila Balazs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Attila Balazs
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
81
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Attila Balazs
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Attila Balazs
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Attila Balazs
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Attila Balazs
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Attila Balazs
38%
(
20 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Attila Balazs
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
11
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Attila Balazs
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Attila Balazs
Player
Altug Celikbilek
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
42%
(
20 of
48)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
7-6(0) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Balazs
Player
Matej Sabanov
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Balazs Vs Samper-Montana Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
