Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Asia Muhammad vs Quinn Gleason Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Muhammad vs Gleason analysis and find out who is favored!
Asia Muhammad vs Quinn Gleason Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Muhammad has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gleason has won 41.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Muhammad, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gleason has won 60%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Muhammad has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gleason has saved 37.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Muhammad has won 61.11% of matches played (W/L 11/ 7), with Gleason winning 28.57% (W/L 4/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Muhammad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 226/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 13/ 20). Gleason has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 82/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Muhammad has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.23% of matches (W/L 9/ 4), where as Gleason has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 4/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Muhammad winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Muhammad winning 2 and Gleason winning 0. The last match between Muhammad and Gleason was at the Lexington, 04-08-2018, Semifinals, Hard with Asia Muhammad getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Muhammad and Gleason have played a deciding set 0 times, with Muhammad winning 0 times and Gleason 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Muhammad winning 0, and Gleason 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Muhammad has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.22 while Gleason has played against players with an average rank of 311.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Muhammad has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gleason has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Muhammad has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gleason has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Muhammad 1 - 0 Gleason
497
Rank
124
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
834
Rank
323
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
54% (316-270)
Career Total W/L
55% (153-125)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$286,274
Career Prize Money
$4,345
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Asia Muhammad | Quinn Gleason |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (31/57) | 80% (51/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (22/31) | 53% (27/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (14/26) | 62% (8/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (29/64) | 37% (21/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Asia Muhammad
Player
Quinn Gleason
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Asia Muhammad | Quinn Gleason |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Asia Muhammad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Asia Muhammad
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
87 of
120)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Asia Muhammad
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Asia Muhammad
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
61%
(
19 of
31)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Amarni Banks
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Anna Brogan
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Quinn Gleason Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Quinn Gleason
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Quinn Gleason
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Gleason
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Quinn Gleason
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Quinn Gleason
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Quinn Gleason
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
68 of
86)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Muhammad Vs Gleason Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
