Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Asia Muhammad vs Laura Sainsbury Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Muhammad vs Sainsbury analysis and find out who is favored!
Asia Muhammad vs Laura Sainsbury Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Muhammad has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sainsbury has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Muhammad, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sainsbury has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Muhammad has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sainsbury has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Muhammad has won 56.52% of matches played (W/L 13/ 10), with Sainsbury winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Muhammad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 226/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 13/ 20). Sainsbury has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 16/ 8), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Muhammad has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 11/ 7), where as Sainsbury has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Muhammad winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Muhammad winning 2 and Sainsbury winning 0. The last match between Muhammad and Sainsbury was at the Manchester, 10-06-2018, Q1 round, Grass with Asia Muhammad getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Muhammad and Sainsbury have played a deciding set 0 times, with Muhammad winning 0 times and Sainsbury 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Muhammad winning 0, and Sainsbury 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Muhammad has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.74 while Sainsbury has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Muhammad has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sainsbury has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Muhammad has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sainsbury has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Muhammad 1 - 0 Sainsbury
456
Rank
124
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
818
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
54% (316-270)
Career Total W/L
57% (54-41)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$286,274
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Asia Muhammad | Laura Sainsbury |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:0 | 0:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (23/42) | 57% (27/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (17/23) | 37% (10/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (11/19) | 30% (6/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 66% (31/47) | 33% (14/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Asia Muhammad
Player
Laura Sainsbury
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Asia Muhammad | Laura Sainsbury |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Asia Muhammad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Asia Muhammad
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
87 of
120)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Asia Muhammad
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Asia Muhammad
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
61%
(
19 of
31)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Amarni Banks
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Anna Brogan
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Sainsbury Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Laura Sainsbury
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Totka
Player
Laura Sainsbury
51%
(
54 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
14
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
48%
(
51 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chanel Simmonds
Player
Laura Sainsbury
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Sainsbury
Player
Marlies Szupper
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
83 of
142)
0
Aces
4
14
Double Faults
10
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
36%
(
18 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
38%
(
11 of
29)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
53%
(
56 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
77 of
142)
126
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Erin Richardson
Player
Laura Sainsbury
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Sainsbury
Player
Eden Silva
69%
(
80 of
116)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
101)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
52 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alicia Barnett
Player
Laura Sainsbury
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Muhammad Vs Sainsbury Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
