Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ashlyn Krueger vs Renata Zarazua Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Zarazua analysis and find out who is favored!
Ashlyn Krueger vs Renata Zarazua Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 44.33% of points on his second serve, while Zarazua has won 51.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 56.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zarazua has won 55.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.78% and 41.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zarazua has saved 54.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 59.02% of matches played (W/L 36/ 25), with Zarazua winning 61.45% (W/L 51/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Zarazua has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 180/ 117), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Zarazua has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 45/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Zarazua winning 1. The last match between Krueger and Zarazua was at the U.S. Open - New York, 24-08-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Ashlyn Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Zarazua have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 1 times and Zarazua 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Zarazua 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 154.36 while Zarazua has played against players with an average rank of 244.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zarazua has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 39.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zarazua has converted 49.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Zarazua
70
Rank
69
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
103
Rank
97
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
58% (119-86)
Career Total W/L
57% (323-248)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$424,110
Career Prize Money
$310,042
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Renata Zarazua |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (71/104) | 66% (67/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (47/71) | 55% (37/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (12/33) | 38% (13/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (8/20) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (51/101) | 43% (45/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Renata Zarazua
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Renata Zarazua |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (30/26) | 48% (25/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (269/252) | 50% (250/246) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 79 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:7 | 2:2:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.87 | 214.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1062/1626) | 72% (1126/1559) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (705/1062) | 58% (652/1126) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (250/564) | 49% (214/433) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (87/220) | 51% (96/189) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (773/1744) | 45% (722/1599) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 56% (5/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (5/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 43% (9/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 64% (11/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 36% (11/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 20% (10/2) |
Ashlyn Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Sofia Kenin
54%
(
67 of
124)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
7
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
12
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
33%
(
19 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
51%
(
63 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Martha Matoula
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
90%
(
19 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Gabriela Lee
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
72%
(
83 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
16
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
30%
(
35 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Renata Zarazua Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Renata Zarazua
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Renata Zarazua
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Alycia Parks
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Renata Zarazua
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
84%
(
52 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Alycia Parks
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
13
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Renata Zarazua
50%
(
57 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
116)
2
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
7
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
47%
(
27 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
42)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
58 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
66 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Mariana Isabel Higuita Barraza
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
16 of
31)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
50
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Renata Zarazua
80%
(
90 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
50%
(
45 of
90)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
55 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
60 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Renata Zarazua
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
80%
(
68 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Renata Zarazua
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Zarazua Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
