Ashlyn Krueger vs Beatriz Haddad Maia Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Jun at 02:11 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Krueger vs B. Haddad Maia

USA
0
Win
Played
2
Win

BRA
0
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Krueger 0 - 2 Maia
They have played 4 sets in total, with Ashlyn Krueger winning 0 and Beatriz Haddad Maia winning 4. The last match between Beatriz Haddad Maia and Ashlyn Krueger was at the Bad Homburg Open - Bad Homburg, 24-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Beatriz Haddad Maia getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krueger | 0 |
| Maia | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Bad Homburg Open - Bad Homburg(06-24-25)
(R2) Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg(05-21-25)
A. Krueger vs B. H. Maia H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,512,233 | Career Prize Money | $5,204,087 |
| 55.71% (161-128) | Career Total W/L | 64.42% (498-275) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 3 | Titles | 22 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 48.84% (21-22) | YTD Win/Loss | 38.10% (16-26) |
A. Krueger vs B. H. Maia Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve performance over the last six months, Maia is slightly ahead of Krueger, with 42.13% of points won compared to Krueger's 40.45%.
- However, Krueger excels in return game stats, having won 49.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maia has won 47.65%. What might this indicate?
- While both players have strengths on different court surfaces, Maia prefers clay with a 66% win rate, whereas Krueger is better on grass with a 61% win rate.
- In pressure-filled moments, Maia has been more successful, saving 55.38% of breakpoints compared to Krueger's 45.98%.
- Over the past year, Krueger has a better overall win ratio with 55.74% compared to Maia’s 50%.
- Their head-to-head record favors Maia, who has won their only previous encounter and all sets played during that match.
- When facing opponents, Krueger tends to play against higher-ranked players, with an average opponent ranking of 59.43, while Maia’s average is slightly lower at 76.78.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Krueger has a slight edge, winning 64% of deciding sets compared to Maia's 54%.
- Both players are similar in break point conversion, with Krueger at 41.83% and Maia at 41.78%.
Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent stats, Maia shows a slight advantage in second serve performance, which could prove beneficial in their upcoming match against Krueger. Yet, Krueger's efficiency in winning return points might counterbalance this edge.
Maia's experience on clay, combined with their superior breakpoint saving ability, further strengthens their position. The previous head-to-head encounter also ended in Maia's favor, suggesting a psychological advantage.
While Krueger's higher-level opponents and their impressive record in deciding sets make them a tough competitor, the factors mentioned favor Maia.
Considering all these aspects, Beatriz Haddad Maia is most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.
Ashlyn Krueger vs Beatriz Haddad Maia Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Krueger vs B. H. Maia H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 14 | Games Won | 25 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:29:51 | Average Match Time | 1:29:51 |
| 65% (88/136) | 1st Serve % | 69% (75/109) |
| 56% (49/88) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (56/75) |
| 40% (19/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (17/34) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (9/21) |
| 33% (36/109) | Return Points Win % | 50% (68/136) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Krueger Recent Matches Played
B. H. Maia Recent Matches Played

A. Krueger vs B. H. Maia Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.71% (161/128) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.42% (498/275) |
| 54.04% (361/307) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.36% (1094/689) |
| 51.47% (3214/3031) | Games Win/Loss | 55.08% (9025/7361) |
| 56.19% (109/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.43% (230/127) |
| 54.84% (34/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.57% (219/115) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.17% (13/11) |
| 57.69% (15/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 62.07% (36/22) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 772 | Aces Total | 1245 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1193 | Total Double Faults | 1929 |
| 1:33:25 | Average Match Time | 1:21:51 |
| 296.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 422.88 |
| 64% (12255/19117) | 1st Serve % | 68% (26870/39777) |
| 63% (7759/12255) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (17540/26826) |
| 44% (3037/6862) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6148/12995) |
| 45% (1056/2332) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2281/4891) |
| 44% (8569/19265) | Return Points Win % | 45% (18356/41074) |
| 46.15% (12/14) | Slam W/L | 60.53% (46/30) |
| 50.91% (28/27) | Masters W/L | 48.84% (42/44) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63.64% (21/12) |
| 54.05% (40/34) | Main Tour W/L | 59.02% (108/75) |
| 60.34% (70/46) | Challenger W/L | 68.87% (219/99) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Futures W/L | 80.52% (62/15) |
| 55% (157/285) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (487/749) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 54% (36/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (100/184) |
| 54% (50/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (150/252) |
| 84% (160/134) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (490/427) |
| 16% (160/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (490/61) |
| 19% (129/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (282/73) |