Arvid Nordquist vs Miguel Tobon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nordquist vs M. Tobon

Arvid Nordquist

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

892

C. Rank

599

889

Best Rank

510

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Miguel Tobon

COL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

892

C. Rank

599

889

Best Rank

510

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Nordquist 1 - 0 Tobon

They have played 2 sets in total, with Arvid Nordquist winning 2 and Miguel Tobon winning 0. The last match between Arvid Nordquist and Miguel Tobon was at the M15 Naples, 19-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Arvid Nordquist getting the victory 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Nordquist	1
Tobon	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) M15 Naples(02-19-25)

Stats

Arvid Nordquist

Miguel Tobon

A. Nordquist vs M. Tobon H2H Profile

A. Nordquist	Stats	M. Tobon
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.00% (132-132)	Career Total W/L	44.26% (27-34)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Nordquist vs M. Tobon Match Preview:

Prognostication on Second Serve Performance: In the realm of recent competitive play, Nordquist has exhibited a commendable proficiency, emerging victorious in a noteworthy 50.78% of points executed on their second serve. Conversely, Tobon, a formidable adversary, has achieved triumph in 49.54% of such instances. It is crucial to acknowledge the presence of an unmistakeable association between this statistical metric and the precision of match predictions.

Insights on Return Game Statistics: Scrutiny of Nordquist's recent track record in returning serves reveals a supremacy in securing victory, capturing an impressive 38.73% of points contested against their opponents' second serves. In contrast, Tobon has exhibited an even more dominant prowess, attaining triumph in 55.06% of these encounters. As for first serve returns, Nordquist's success rate stands at a commendable 36.98%, whereas Tobon has achieved victory in 32.86% of such situations. This analysis significantly contributes to deducing the favorites in their head-to-head battle.

Critical Analysis of Performance Under Pressure: When subjected to intense pressure, Nordquist has demonstrated resilience, successfully defending against a remarkable 48.84% of breakpoints in their recent matches. Conversely, Tobon has showcased an even higher level of acumen in this area, effectively warding off 58.33% of such precarious situations. This valuable statistic provides a powerful tool for those engaging in in-game betting predictions.

An Overview of Overall Performance: Over the past year, Nordquist has proved to be a formidable force on the tennis court, prevailing in an impressive 56.67% of matches contested (with a win-loss ratio of 17/13). On the other hand, Tobon's performance has remained commendable, securing victory in 43.75% of matches played (with a win-loss ratio of 7/9). These figures shall afford us a comprehensive perspective and a glimpse into their forthcoming head-to-head encounter.

Examining the Best Surface: When considering Nordquist's career, it becomes evident that their most triumphant surface is Clay, showcasing a remarkable 53% success rate (with a win-loss ratio of 51/45). Alternatively, their least favorable surface is Indoor Hard, where their triumph is realized only 47% of the time (with a win-loss ratio of 15/17). Conversely, Tobon demonstrates exceptional prowess on Hard courts, bolstered by a remarkable 57% success rate (with a win-loss ratio of 4/3). Regrettably, their proficiency on Clay diminishes to a mere 21% success rate (with a win-loss ratio of 4/15).

Assessing Player Level: Throughout the previous year, Nordquist predominantly participated in tournaments classified as Futures, Satellites, or ITF with a prize pool of $10K, amassing a commendable win ratio of 57.14% (with a win-loss ratio of 16/12). Meanwhile, Tobon too engaged in similar tournaments but their success rate was slightly lower, standing at 46.67% (with a win-loss ratio of 7/8). When endeavoring to predict the favored competitor by comparing their statistics, it is paramount to consider the relative significance of the events in which they have actively partaken.

Scrutinizing Opponent Quality: The past 12 months have witnessed Nordquist compete against adversaries adorned with an average rank of 427.27. Dissimilarly, Tobon has faced rivals boasting a mean ranking of 390.63. This statistical insight into their recent competition shall undoubtedly carry great weight in our discernment.

Deciding Set Performance vs All Comers: For those enthusiasts whose curiosity extends to live predictions and the domain of betting, it is crucial to recognize that in the event this enthralling match reaches a decisive set, Nordquist has secured triumph in exactly half of such encounters over the past year. Meanwhile, Tobon too has demonstrated an equal measure of success, emerging victorious in 50% of all matches contested on the tour.

Pertinent Statistics in the Current Event: The assessment of prior individual performances serves as a highly valuable resource when venturing to predict the outcome of forthcoming tennis matches. However, once a tournament commences, it is crucial to incorporate current event statistics to ascertain the formidability of players amidst their contemporaries. Interested parties are encouraged to peruse the section below (if any match has been completed in the ongoing event). It is essential to recognize that certain players may demonstrate superior prowess on specific occasions or within particular settings, a vital factor that should undoubtedly influence our prognostication process.

Break Point Conversion: Recent performances shed light on Nordquist's remarkable ability to seize the moment and capitalize on break point opportunities, successfully converting 36.36% of instances. Meanwhile, Tobon has showcased remarkable dexterity in this facet of the game, capitalizing on 46.48% of opportunities to dismantle their opponents' serves. This pivotal statistic shall undoubtedly guide those seeking ingenuous live betting tips when either player encounters a break point opportunity.

If you possess an avid proclivity for predictive models shaping the outcome of enthralling tennis matches, it is highly recommended to peruse this exceptional article (Please note: Only those endowed with an affinity for statistics need apply).

Arvid Nordquist vs Miguel Tobon Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Nordquist vs M. Tobon H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Nordquist	Stats	M. Tobon
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
0	Aces (Total)	1
1	Total Double Faults	7
1:23:51	Average Match Time	1:23:51
71% (27/38)	1st Serve %	61% (36/59)
78% (21/27)	1st Serve Win %	47% (17/36)
73% (8/11)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (10/23)
56% (5/9)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/1)
54% (32/59)	Return Points Win %	24% (9/38)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Nordquist Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Falun - 22-09-2025
R1 Benjamin HannestadB. Hannestad	L	7-6(8) 6-4	Stats
Q3 Vlad JensenV. Jensen	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
M15 Bastad - 18-08-2025
Q1 Andreja PetrovicA. Petrovic	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Asuncion Challenger - 17-03-2025
Q1 Nicolas KickerN. Kicker	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
M25 Asuncion - 10-03-2025
Q1 Maximo ZeituneM. Zeitune	L	7-6(7) 3-6 10-7	Stats

View All

M. Tobon Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Curitiba Challenger - 13-10-2025
R1 Murkel DellienM. Dellien	L	5-7 6-0 6-4	Stats
Q3 Bruno KuzuharaB. Kuzuhara	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Q1 Gabriel SchenekenbergG. Schenekenberg	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
Cali Challenger - 06-10-2025
R1 Matias SotoM. Soto	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
Istanbul Challenger - 01-09-2025
Q3 Peter MakkP. Makk	L	6-7(7) 7-6(5) 6-4	Stats

View All

A. Nordquist vs M. Tobon Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Nordquist	Stats	M. Tobon
50.00% (132/132)	YTD Win/Loss	45.00% (27/33)
50.96% (293/282)	Sets Win/Loss	46.10% (65/76)
51.54% (2715/2553)	Games Win/Loss	48.71% (641/675)
49.61% (64/65)	Hard Win/Loss	50.00% (8/8)
51.49% (52/49)	Clay Win/Loss	43.18% (19/25)
47.06% (16/18)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
0.1	Aces Per Game	0.27
252	Aces Total	172
0.15	Double Faults Per Game	0.42
383	Total Double Faults	270
1st Match	Average Match Time	1:22:55
354.4	Average Opponent Rank	436.58
66% (5810/8817)	1st Serve %	60% (2200/3662)
64% (3696/5810)	1st Serve Win %	66% (1462/2200)
48% (1456/3007)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (708/1462)
44% (351/791)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (142/328)
39% (3323/8627)	Return Points Win %	39% (1343/3429)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/2)
25.00% (1/3)	Challenger W/L	44.12% (15/19)
50.38% (131/129)	Futures W/L	50.00% (12/12)
51% (131/257)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	46% (26/57)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	33% (1/3)
47% (25/53)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (10/19)
44% (23/52)	Deciding Set Win %	41% (7/17)
87% (142/124)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (25/22)
13% (142/18)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (25/3)
7% (122/8)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (35/5)