Arthur Weber vs Taketo Takamisawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Arthur Weber's second serve points win rate is 42.32%, slightly outperforming Taketo Takamisawa's 40.45%. Is this minor edge significant? It might contribute to a higher match prediction accuracy.
• When it comes to return games, Taketo Takamisawa excels by winning 44.32% of second serve return points compared to Arthur Weber's 38.28%.
• For first serve returns, Taketo once again outshines, with 31.88% versus Weber's 28.20%.
• Under pressure, Taketo saves 51.96% of breakpoints, slightly better than Weber’s 50.00%. Could this be decisive in key moments?
• In the last year, Weber boasts a win rate of 70.21%, compared to Taketo's 57.14%, suggesting an edge in overall performance.
• Both players perform best on hard courts, winning 69% of matches; however, Arthur has more experience with 194 matches compared to Taketo's 127.
• Arthur has been more dominant at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level with a 79.49% win rate, substantially higher than Taketo's 58.82%.
• The quality of opponents varies, as Weber faced players with an average rank of 477.47, while Taketo's opponents were significantly higher ranked, averaging 102.69. How much does opponent quality factor in?
• Deciding sets favor Arthur, who has won 56% of these over the past year, whereas Taketo trails with 43%.
• Taketo outperforms in breakpoint conversion, seizing 36.08% of opportunities compared to Weber's 23.89%.

Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):

Arthur Weber displays a slight advantage in second serve performance, which is often a critical factor in match prediction. Though Taketo Takamisawa is more effective in returning serves, especially the first serve, this might be neutralized by Arthur's overall sturdy game.

Their respective ability to manage breakpoints shows Taketo has the upper hand with minimal differences. However, Arthur’s higher win percentage over the past year provides a considerable edge in overall match performance.

Arthur’s decisive set performance and his dominance at lower-ranked tournaments highlight his tenacity and potential to close matches effectively. While Taketo plays against more highly ranked opponents, Arthur's success rate remains impressive at his current competitive level.

Despite Taketo’s edge in breakpoint conversions, Arthur's strong match-winning record, particularly in decisive sets, might be the determining factor in this face-off.

Given these considerations, Arthur Weber is the more likely winner in the upcoming tennis match.