Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Rinderknech vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rinderknech vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Rinderknech vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rinderknech has won 50.35% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rinderknech, in recent form, has won 48.21% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.41% and 25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rinderknech has saved 62.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 54.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rinderknech has won 51.52% of matches played (W/L 34/ 32), with Ilkel winning 39.58% (W/L 19/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rinderknech has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 93/ 56), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Rinderknech has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 45.16% of matches (W/L 14/ 17), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rinderknech winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rinderknech winning 2 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Rinderknech and Ilkel was at the Rennes Challenger, 24-01-2020, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Arthur Rinderknech getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rinderknech and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rinderknech winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rinderknech winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rinderknech has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.86 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 237.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rinderknech has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rinderknech has converted 37.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 45.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rinderknech 1 - 0 Ilkel
79
Rank
42
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
415
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
61% (279-176)
Career Total W/L
56% (400-309)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$1,088,660
Career Prize Money
$225,530
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rinderknech VS Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Arthur Rinderknech | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:29 | 1:53:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (52/84) | 63% (55/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (37/52) | 64% (35/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (17/32) | 48% (16/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (37/88) | 36% (30/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Rinderknech VS Ilkel H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
12
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Rinderknech | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (36/30) | 43% (17/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (348/338) | 46% (165/195) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.77 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 260 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:48 | 1:28:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 198.56 | 162.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1362/2047) | 57% (616/1073) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (1044/1362) | 72% (442/616) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (348/685) | 46% (210/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (54/154) | 43% (32/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (729/2168) | 36% (378/1044) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (8/4) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (14/24) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 20% (10/2) |
Arthur Rinderknech Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Hugo Gaston
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
48 of
59)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
28 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
73%
(
76 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
3
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Blaise Bicknell
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
10
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
17 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
5
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Rinky Hijikata
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Joris De Loore
75%
(
65 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
7
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
58 of
74)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
19 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
29 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Otto Virtanen
79%
(
69 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
12
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Billy Harris
77%
(
77 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
16
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Rinderknech Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Arthur Rinderknech
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
