Arthur Gea vs Gerard Campana Lee Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Apr at 09:21 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Gea vs G. Campana Lee

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gea 2 - 0 Lee
They have played 5 sets in total, with Arthur Gea winning 4 and Gerard Campana Lee winning 1. The last match between Arthur Gea and Gerard Campana Lee was at the Menorca Challenger, 02-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Arthur Gea getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gea | 2 |
| Lee | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Menorca Challenger(04-02-25)
(R1) M15 Antalya(03-14-23)
A. Gea vs G. C. Lee H2H Profile
A. Gea vs G. C. Lee Match Preview:
Analyzing the upcoming tennis match between Gea and Lee, we look at various statistical metrics to predict the outcome. In recent performance, Gea has converted 41.46% of breakpoint opportunities, outperforming Lee, who has a conversion rate of 34.86%. Gea exhibits a stronger ability to seize opportunities under pressure, a key factor in determining the match's potential winner.
A particularly telling statistic is Gea's second serve performance, with Gea winning 39.1% of points, slightly trailing Lee, who has a second serve win percentage of 43.52%. This metric holds high predictive value for match outcomes. In return game stats, Gea has claimed 48.25% of opponents' second serve points, while Lee has secured 52.14%. Similarly, on first serve returns, Gea wins 27.91% compared to Lee's 30.96%.
Recent-form analysis shows Gea has saved 47.71% of breakpoints, while Lee has a higher breakpoint save percentage at 51.12%. Under intense match conditions, this could give Lee a slight edge. However, Gea's overall surface performance demonstrates proficiency on hard courts with a win rate of 76%, whereas Lee shows stronger results on clay courts, winning 54% of the time.
Delving deeper into their head-to-head encounters, Gea has won their only previous meeting, suggesting a psychological advantage. Despite playing against opponents often averaging higher ranks, Gea's experience might play a crucial role here.
Finally, while both Gea and Lee have played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF circuit, Gea has demonstrated a marginally superior form over the past year, claiming 58.57% of matches. Given all these insights, the predictive data slightly favors Arthur Gea to secure victory in their forthcoming clash against Lee.
Arthur Gea vs Gerard Campana Lee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Gea vs G. C. Lee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 16 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:47:51 | Average Match Time | 1:47:51 |
| 61% (85/139) | 1st Serve % | 59% (70/118) |
| 68% (58/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (43/70) |
| 50% (27/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (20/48) |
| 91% (10/11) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 47% (55/118) | Return Points Win % | 39% (54/139) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Gea Recent Matches Played
G. C. Lee Recent Matches Played

A. Gea vs G. C. Lee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.00% (123/82) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.28% (89/88) |
| 59.18% (274/189) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.21% (211/201) |
| 53.91% (2269/1940) | Games Win/Loss | 50.68% (2017/1963) |
| 76.19% (48/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 50.91% (56/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.88% (83/77) |
| 59.38% (19/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 472 | Aces Total | 331 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 663 | Total Double Faults | 597 |
| 1:44:14 | Average Match Time | 1:48:46 |
| 234.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 400.24 |
| 61% (8245/13478) | 1st Serve % | 62% (7331/11884) |
| 67% (5535/8245) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4687/7331) |
| 48% (2536/5233) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2226/4553) |
| 47% (713/1503) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (560/1225) |
| 43% (5780/13313) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4854/11579) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.62% (41/53) | Challenger W/L | 47.41% (55/61) |
| 75.96% (79/25) | Futures W/L | 56.67% (34/26) |
| 60% (119/199) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (88/175) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (23/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (24/49) |
| 45% (27/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (25/58) |
| 85% (128/109) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (101/78) |
| 15% (128/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (101/23) |
| 17% (76/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (76/11) |