Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Fery vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fery vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Fery vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fery has won 45.94% of points on his second serve, while Broom has won 54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fery, in recent form, has won 49.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 54.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.65% and 31.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fery has saved 66.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fery has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 36/ 18), with Broom winning 54.79% (W/L 40/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fery has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 35/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Fery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.65% of matches (W/L 23/ 11), where as Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Fery winning 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Fery winning 4 and Broom winning 4. The last match between Fery and Broom was at the Orleans Challenger, 24-09-2023, Q1 round, I.hard with Arthur Fery getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fery and Broom have played a deciding set 2 times, with Fery winning 0 times and Broom 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fery winning 1, and Broom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fery has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.83 while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 207.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fery has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fery has converted 43.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 39.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fery 1 - 2 Broom
258
Rank
258
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor2
0
Grass0
339
Rank
322
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
62% (87-53)
Career Total W/L
63% (196-116)
70% (7-3)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$32,000
Career Prize Money
$36,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Arthur Fery | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 37 | 39 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:39 | 1:53:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (168/259) | 60% (140/235) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (114/168) | 70% (98/140) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (42/91) | 54% (51/95) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (8/15) | 35% (9/26) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (86/235) | 40% (103/259) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Arthur Fery
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Arthur Fery
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
7
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 6-3 2-6 6-2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Arthur Fery
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Fery | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (7/3) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (16/6) | 51% (26/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (121/90) | 50% (247/251) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 147 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:8 | 1:55:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 368.6 | 138.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (463/706) | 63% (983/1559) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (327/463) | 71% (695/983) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (111/243) | 53% (308/576) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (38/91) | 34% (52/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (311/697) | 39% (649/1684) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (5/2) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 60% (6/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (7/9) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 27% (11/3) |
Arthur Fery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Arthur Fery
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 6-7(8) 4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Arthur Fery
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Jules Marie
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Arthur Fery
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Daniil Glinka
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Hiroki Moriya
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Salvatore Caruso
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Fery Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
