Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur De Greef vs Liam Broady Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Greef vs Broady analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur De Greef vs Liam Broady Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Greef has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Broady has won 47.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Greef, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broady has won 50.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Greef has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broady has saved 60.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Greef has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Broady winning 54.55% (W/L 30/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Greef has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 318/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 249/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 32/ 55).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Greef winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Greef winning 4 and Broady winning 0. The last match between Greef and Broady was at the Nanjing Challenger, 18-04-2016, First, Clay with Arthur De Greef getting the victory 1100037242.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Greef and Broady have played a deciding set 0 times, with Greef winning 0 times and Broady 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Greef winning 0, and Broady 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Greef has played against opponents with an average rank of while Broady has played against players with an average rank of 286.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Greef has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broady has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Greef has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broady has converted 41.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Greef 2 - 0 Broady
Ret.
Rank
113
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
150
Rank
93
High
30
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
60% (372-251)
Career Total W/L
58% (470-343)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$140,200
Career Prize Money
$1,004,050
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Arthur De Greef | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:36:50 | 0:36:50 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (34/60) | 66% (35/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (21/34) | 49% (17/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (29/53) | 40% (24/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Arthur De Greef
Player
Liam Broady
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-0 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur De Greef | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (101/93) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:34:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 207.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (373/619) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (263/373) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (121/246) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (27/66) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (249/626) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Arthur De Greef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Arthur De Greef
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Arthur De Greef
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur De Greef
Player
Vit Kopriva
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nouza
Player
Arthur De Greef
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tommy Robredo
Player
Arthur De Greef
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Liam Broady
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Pedro Cachin
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Aziz Dougaz
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Greef Vs Broady Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
