Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur De Greef vs Johannes Haerteis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Greef vs Haerteis analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur De Greef vs Johannes Haerteis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Greef has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Haerteis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Greef, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Haerteis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Greef has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Haerteis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Greef has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Haerteis winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Greef has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 318/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Haerteis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 42/ 36), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Greef winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Greef winning 0 and Haerteis winning 2. The last match between Greef and Haerteis was at the Prostejov Challenger, 03-06-2019, Second, Clay with Johannes Haerteis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Greef and Haerteis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Greef winning 0 times and Haerteis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Greef winning 0, and Haerteis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Greef has played against opponents with an average rank of while Haerteis has played against players with an average rank of 315.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Greef has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Haerteis has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Greef has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Haerteis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Greef 0 - 1 Haerteis
Ret.
Rank
113
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
300
High
28
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
60% (372-251)
Career Total W/L
51% (226-218)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$140,200
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Arthur De Greef | Johannes Haerteis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:3 | 1:47:3 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (32/67) | 68% (60/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (26/32) | 65% (39/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (14/35) | 50% (14/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 7% (1/14) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (35/88) | 40% (27/67) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Arthur De Greef
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur De Greef | Johannes Haerteis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Arthur De Greef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Arthur De Greef
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Arthur De Greef
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur De Greef
Player
Vit Kopriva
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nouza
Player
Arthur De Greef
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tommy Robredo
Player
Arthur De Greef
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Johannes Haerteis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mikail Alimli
Player
Johannes Haerteis
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Johannes Haerteis
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Jody Maginley
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Johannes Haerteis
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
14
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Johannes Haerteis
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Luca Hesselmann
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Johannes Haerteis
72%
(
78 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Johannes Haerteis
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Kai Lemstra
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(2) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Greef Vs Haerteis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
