Prediction of Anthony Jackie Tang vs Ching Lam Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Jackie Tang vs C. Lam

Anthony Jackie Tang
HKG
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
26
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Ching Lam
HKG
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
26
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Tang 1 - 0 Lam
They have played 3 sets in total, with Anthony Jackie Tang winning 2 and Ching Lam winning 1. The last match between Anthony Jackie Tang and Ching Lam was at the Hong Kong F2 (Hong Kong), 27-06-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Anthony Jackie Tang getting the victory 6-7(3) 7-6(6) 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tang | 1 |
| Lam | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Hong Kong F2 (Hong Kong)(06-27-17)
Anthony Jackie Tang
6
7
7
Ching Lam
7
6
5
A. J. Tang vs C. Lam H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.74% (17-21) | Career Total W/L | 26.09% (6-17) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. J. Tang vs C. Lam Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anthony Jackie Tang has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ching Lam has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anthony Jackie Tang, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ching Lam has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Anthony Jackie Tang has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ching Lam has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Anthony Jackie Tang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ching Lam winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Anthony Jackie Tang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 15/19). Ching Lam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Anthony Jackie Tang has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ching Lam has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Anthony Jackie Tang winning 1 times and Ching Lam being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Anthony Jackie Tang winning 2 and Ching Lam winning 1.
- The last match between Anthony Jackie Tang and Ching Lam was at the Hong Kong F2 (Hong Kong), 27-06-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Anthony Jackie Tang getting the victory 6-7(3) 7-6(6) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 4:22:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anthony Jackie Tang has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ching Lam has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anthony Jackie Tang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ching Lam has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Anthony Jackie Tang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ching Lam has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Anthony Jackie Tang vs Ching Lam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. J. Tang vs C. Lam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 18 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 4:22:0 | Average Match Time | 4:22:0 |
| 48% (62/129) | 1st Serve % | 63% (93/147) |
| 58% (36/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (54/93) |
| 46% (31/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (25/54) |
| 36% (8/22) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (7/16) |
| 46% (68/147) | Return Points Win % | 48% (62/129) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Tang 0%, Lam 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tang 0%, Lam 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Tang 0%, Lam 0%.
A. J. Tang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 4-6 10-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
C. Lam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-7(6) 10-7 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||

A. J. Tang vs C. Lam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.74% (17/21) | YTD Win/Loss | 26.09% (6/17) |
| 45.88% (39/46) | Sets Win/Loss | 31.48% (17/37) |
| 49.81% (397/400) | Games Win/Loss | 41.09% (196/281) |
| 44.12% (15/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 27.27% (6/16) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 73 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 75 | Total Double Faults | 42 |
| 1:14:17 | Average Match Time | 1:6:23 |
| 509.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 415.35 |
| 58% (949/1625) | 1st Serve % | 61% (549/907) |
| 66% (622/949) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (296/549) |
| 52% (352/676) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (152/358) |
| 43% (61/143) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (39/97) |
| 39% (633/1630) | Return Points Win % | 41% (371/904) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 43.24% (16/21) | Futures W/L | 27.27% (6/16) |
| 43% (16/37) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 26% (6/23) |
| 44% (4/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 40% (4/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 70% (20/14) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (6/4) |
| 30% (20/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (6/2) |
| 17% (18/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (17/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction06:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction07:30 PM 15/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:05 PM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
16:00
H2H 0-1
07:35
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal