Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Rio Wakayama Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peeters vs Wakayama analysis and find out who is favored!
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Rio Wakayama Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peeters has won 43.59% of points on his second serve, while Wakayama has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peeters, in recent form, has won 57.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wakayama has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peeters has saved 54.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wakayama has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peeters has won 49.06% of matches played (W/L 26/ 27), with Wakayama winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26). Wakayama has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Peeters has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Wakayama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peeters winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peeters winning 2 and Wakayama winning 0. The last match between Peeters and Wakayama was at the W15 Antalya, 02-05-2022, Q2 round, Clay with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peeters and Wakayama have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peeters winning 0 times and Wakayama 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peeters winning 0, and Wakayama 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peeters has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.11 while Wakayama has played against players with an average rank of 707.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peeters has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wakayama has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peeters has converted 47.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wakayama has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peeters 1 - 0 Wakayama
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
852
Rank
663
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (72-55)
Career Total W/L
25% (1-3)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Rio Wakayama |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 1 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 0:53:0 | 0:53:0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (20/33) | 74% (25/34) |
1st Serve Win% | 85% (17/20) | 40% (10/25) |
2nd Serve Win% | 85% (11/13) | 22% (2/9) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 65% (22/34) | 15% (5/33) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-1 |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Rio Wakayama
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
25 of
34)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50
Total Points Won
17
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Rio Wakayama |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 51% (19/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (172/150) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
Aces Total | 18 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.49 | 0 |
DFs Total | 77 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:42 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 147.82 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (633/1013) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (392/633) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (164/380) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (58/135) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 47% (431/918) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Maya Drozd
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Sandra Samir
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Boyoung Jeong
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Merna Refaat
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Laura Samsonova
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Varvara Bernovich
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Rio Wakayama Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Rio Wakayama
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
25 of
34)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 2-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more