Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Merel Hoedt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peeters vs Hoedt analysis and find out who is favored!
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Merel Hoedt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peeters has won 43.53% of points on his second serve, while Hoedt has won 43.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peeters, in recent form, has won 57.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hoedt has won 56.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.53% and 42.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peeters has saved 56.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hoedt has saved 52.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peeters has won 48.15% of matches played (W/L 26/ 28), with Hoedt winning 59.38% (W/L 38/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26). Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 101/ 78), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Peeters has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20), where as Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Peeters winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Peeters winning 2 and Hoedt winning 2. The last match between Peeters and Hoedt was at the W15 Eindhoven, 20-08-2022, Semifinals, Clay with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peeters and Hoedt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peeters winning 0 times and Hoedt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peeters winning 0, and Hoedt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peeters has played against opponents with an average rank of 119.85 while Hoedt has played against players with an average rank of 168.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peeters has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hoedt has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peeters has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hoedt has converted 50.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peeters 1 - 1 Hoedt
852
Rank
663
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
540
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
57% (72-55)
Career Total W/L
55% (158-130)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Merel Hoedt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (83/122) | 63% (84/134) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (43/83) | 50% (42/84) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (18/39) | 36% (18/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (11/24) | 50% (9/18) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (74/134) | 50% (61/122) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Merel Hoedt
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
1
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
52%
(
37 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Merel Hoedt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (19/18) | 60% (28/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (172/150) | 54% (238/201) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.49 | 0.62 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 132 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:42 | 1:54:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.82 | 247.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (633/1013) | 67% (920/1376) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (392/633) | 62% (570/920) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (164/380) | 43% (194/456) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (58/135) | 50% (101/203) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (431/918) | 48% (712/1491) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 58% (7/5) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 11% (9/1) |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Maya Drozd
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Boyoung Jeong
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Merna Refaat
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Samsonova
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Varvara Bernovich
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Merel Hoedt
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Alexandra Vasilyeva
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enola Chiesa
Player
Merel Hoedt
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
53%
(
35 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Margot Phanthala
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carmen Lopez Martinez
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
13
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Peeters Vs Hoedt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
