Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Eva Bennemann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 02:27 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Vrancken Peeters vs E. Bennemann

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Peeters 1 - 0 Bennemann
They have played 3 sets in total, with Anouck Vrancken Peeters winning 2 and Eva Bennemann winning 1. The last match between Anouck Vrancken Peeters and Eva Bennemann was at the W75 Hamburg, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory 0-6 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peeters | 1 |
| Bennemann | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W75 Hamburg(10-22-25)
A. V. Peeters vs E. Bennemann H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.46% (132-90) | Career Total W/L | 68.42% (26-12) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. V. Peeters vs E. Bennemann Match Preview:
- Anouck Vrancken Peeters has a slight advantage in winning points on their second serve with a 39.83% success rate, compared to Eva Bennemann's 37.50%. Could this edge be pivotal? It often is in similar match-ups.
- On return games, Anouck has demonstrated a stronger performance by winning 52.63% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Eva has managed 48.68%. How crucial will this stat be in predicting the match outcome? Usually, it significantly influences predictions.
- For first serve returns, Anouck narrowly leads with 37.08% over Eva's 36.90%, which is a useful indicator when assessing who might be favored.
- Analyzing pressure situations, Anouck has been able to save 50.92% of breakpoints, outperforming Eva who saved 46.44%. Will this resilience be a deciding factor if the match gets tight?
- Over the past year, Eva Bennemann boasts a higher win rate of 75.00%, compared to Anouck's 67.11%, despite playing fewer matches. Does this suggest a higher level of performance consistency?
- Both players excel on indoor hard courts with identical win rates of 79%. However, Anouck has a noticeable disadvantage on grass, winning no matches, while Eva struggles more on clay.
- At the tournament level, both players have similar success rates, with Eva winning 60.00% of matches and Anouck at 61.54% in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K.
- Considering the quality of their opponents, Eva has faced more challenging competitors with an average rank of 310.67 versus Anouck's 432.79. Could this suggest Eva is better prepared for tougher matches?
- In deciding set scenarios, Anouck has a higher winning percentage at 68% compared to Eva's 60%. Will this factor in if the match extends to a deciding set?
- The current event performance and specific tournament history should not be overlooked when predicting match outcomes.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing second serve performances and return game stats, Anouck Vrancken Peeters shows a slight edge over Eva Bennemann. Her ability to win points on the second serve and excel in return games could prove advantageous.
When under pressure, Anouck's higher breakpoint saving rate suggests more resilience, crucial in tightly contested matches. Additionally, her strong performance in deciding sets over the past year adds to her potential as a favorite.
While Eva has shown impressive consistency with a higher win rate over fewer matches and has faced tougher opponents, Anouck's strengths potentially outweigh Eva's advantages.
Given these factors, Anouck Vrancken Peeters is the likely favorite to win this upcoming tennis match.
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Eva Bennemann Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. V. Peeters vs E. Bennemann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 15 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:40:56 | Average Match Time | 2:40:56 |
| 58% (52/90) | 1st Serve % | 63% (75/120) |
| 56% (29/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (39/75) |
| 42% (16/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (21/45) |
| 47% (7/15) | Break Pts Won % | 53% (8/15) |
| 50% (60/120) | Return Points Win % | 50% (45/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. V. Peeters Recent Matches Played
E. Bennemann Recent Matches Played

A. V. Peeters vs E. Bennemann Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.46% (132/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.42% (26/12) |
| 57.28% (295/220) | Sets Win/Loss | 67.06% (57/28) |
| 53.78% (2537/2180) | Games Win/Loss | 58.21% (436/313) |
| 60.27% (44/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.21% (58/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.75% (22/10) |
| 76.92% (30/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 144 | Aces Total | 14 |
| 0.45 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1034 | Total Double Faults | 134 |
| 1:39:55 | Average Match Time | 1:39:23 |
| 420.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 397.21 |
| 63% (8554/13546) | 1st Serve % | 65% (1545/2368) |
| 59% (5058/8554) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (894/1545) |
| 44% (2178/4992) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (383/823) |
| 52% (936/1813) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (196/356) |
| 49% (6472/13318) | Return Points Win % | 52% (1243/2407) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.55% (48/40) | Challenger W/L | 54.17% (13/11) |
| 63.16% (84/49) | Futures W/L | 92.86% (13/1) |
| 60% (131/220) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 45% (18/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 56% (41/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 88% (120/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (27/23) |
| 13% (120/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (27/4) |
| 25% (102/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (11/3) |