Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Cosima Trinity Calinescu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peeters vs Calinescu analysis and find out who is favored!
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Cosima Trinity Calinescu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peeters has won 43.59% of points on his second serve, while Calinescu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peeters, in recent form, has won 57.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Calinescu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peeters has saved 54.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Calinescu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peeters has won 49.06% of matches played (W/L 26/ 27), with Calinescu winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26). Calinescu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 10/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 5/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Peeters has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Calinescu has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peeters winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peeters winning 2 and Calinescu winning 0. The last match between Peeters and Calinescu was at the W15 Villena, 06-02-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peeters and Calinescu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peeters winning 0 times and Calinescu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peeters winning 0, and Calinescu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peeters has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.11 while Calinescu has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peeters has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Calinescu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peeters has converted 47.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Calinescu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peeters 1 - 0 Calinescu
852
Rank
663
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
57% (72-55)
Career Total W/L
31% (15-33)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Cosima Trinity Calinescu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Cosima Trinity Calinescu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (19/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (172/150) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.49 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:42 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.82 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (633/1013) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (392/633) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (164/380) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (58/135) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (431/918) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Maya Drozd
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Boyoung Jeong
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Merna Refaat
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Samsonova
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Varvara Bernovich
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cosima Trinity Calinescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marie Temin
Player
Cosima Trinity Calinescu
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cosima Trinity Calinescu
Player
Ofer Kivity
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lynda Benkaddour
Player
Cosima Trinity Calinescu
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Cosima Trinity Calinescu
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Peeters Vs Calinescu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
