Prediction of Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Shahar Peer Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Groenefeld vs S. Peer

Anna-Lena Groenefeld

GER

1

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

1.80m

Height

1.70m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$836.3K

Career Money

$2.9M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Shahar Peer

ISR

1

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

1.80m

Height

1.70m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$836.3K

Career Money

$2.9M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Groenefeld 1 - 3 Peer

They have played 8 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Groenefeld winning 2 and Shahar Peer winning 6. The last match between Shahar Peer and Anna-Lena Groenefeld was at the Qatar German Open - Berlin, 07-05-2007, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Shahar Peer getting the victory 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Groenefeld	1
Peer	3

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R1) Qatar German Open - Berlin(05-07-07)

Stats

Shahar Peer

Anna-Lena Groenefeld

(R1) Medibank International - Sydney(01-07-07)

Stats

Shahar Peer

Anna-Lena Groenefeld

(SF) Istanbul Cup - Istanbul(05-26-06)

Stats

Shahar Peer

Anna-Lena Groenefeld

A. Groenefeld vs S. Peer H2H Profile

A. Groenefeld	Stats	S. Peer
$836,300	Career Prize Money	$2,894,734
56.78% (268-204)	Career Total W/L	58.08% (388-280)
0	Clay	2
1	Hard	1
11	Titles	9
1	Total H2H Matches	3
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Groenefeld vs S. Peer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anna-Lena Groenefeld has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Shahar Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anna-Lena Groenefeld, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Shahar Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Anna-Lena Groenefeld has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shahar Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Anna-Lena Groenefeld has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Shahar Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Anna-Lena Groenefeld has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 128/67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 3/12). Shahar Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 247/165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/23).
Player level: In the last year, Anna-Lena Groenefeld has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Shahar Peer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Anna-Lena Groenefeld winning 1 times and Shahar Peer being victorious 3 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Groenefeld winning 2 and Shahar Peer winning 6.
The last match between Anna-Lena Groenefeld and Shahar Peer was at the Qatar German Open - Berlin, 07-05-2007, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Shahar Peer getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anna-Lena Groenefeld has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Shahar Peer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anna-Lena Groenefeld has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shahar Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Anna-Lena Groenefeld has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shahar Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Shahar Peer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Groenefeld vs S. Peer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Groenefeld	Stats	S. Peer
1	H2H Matches Won	3
2	Sets Won	6
24	Games Won	42
2	Aces (Total)	5
13	Total Double Faults	2
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
44% (52/117)	1st Serve %	63% (71/112)
62% (32/52)	1st Serve Win %	73% (52/71)
34% (22/65)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (18/41)
38% (3/8)	Break Pts Won %	45% (10/22)
38% (42/112)	Return Points Win %	54% (63/117)
25% (1/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	75% (3/4)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (3/3)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Groenefeld Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Generali Ladies Linz - Linz - 10-10-2011
Q2 Evgeniya RodinaE. Rodina	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Q1 Kathrin WoerleK. Woerle	W	6-4 3-6 7-6(4)	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 29-08-2011
Q1 Urszula RadwanskaU. Radwanska	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Hechingen - 01-08-2011
R1 Sarah GronertS. Gronert	L	4-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Olomouc - 25-07-2011
R1 Masa Zec-PeskiricM. Zec-Peskiric	W	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

S. Peer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Abierto Monterrey Afirme - Monterrey - 29-02-2016
Q1 Viktorija GolubicV. Golubic	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro - 15-02-2016
Q1 Paula Cristina GoncalvesP. Cristina	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Fed Cup, Europe/Africa Zone Group I - 01-02-2016
Rubber 1 Kateryna VolodkoK. Volodko	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Rubber 1 Tena LukasT. Lukas	W	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Rubber 1 Valeria GorlatsV. Gorlats	W	6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

A. Groenefeld vs S. Peer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Groenefeld	Stats	S. Peer
56.87% (265/201)	YTD Win/Loss	58.35% (388/277)
55.58% (588/470)	Sets Win/Loss	56.14% (855/668)
52.47% (5076/4598)	Games Win/Loss	52.37% (7235/6580)
55.38% (103/83)	Hard Win/Loss	59.95% (247/165)
65.64% (128/67)	Clay Win/Loss	57.53% (84/62)
44.29% (31/39)	Indoor Hard W/L	59.09% (39/27)
20.00% (3/12)	Grass Win/Loss	43.90% (18/23)
0.14	Aces Per Game	0.08
643	Aces Total	551
0.21	Double Faults Per Game	0.23
994	Total Double Faults	1575
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
501.84	Average Opponent Rank	516.4
56% (6972/12439)	1st Serve %	65% (21212/32646)
67% (4661/6999)	1st Serve Win %	61% (12882/21212)
45% (2483/5489)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (5081/11441)
45% (618/1379)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (2024/4236)
44% (5557/12549)	Return Points Win %	46% (15135/32818)
50.91% (28/27)	Slam W/L	57.14% (60/45)
50.00% (34/34)	Masters W/L	54.84% (85/70)
61.11% (11/7)	Cups W/L	61.76% (21/13)
51.24% (103/98)	Main Tour W/L	59.43% (189/129)
70.59% (84/35)	Challenger W/L	62.26% (33/20)
100.00% (5/0)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
57% (262/460)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (384/659)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (2/2)
46% (45/97)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (71/125)
55% (71/129)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (114/195)
89% (260/231)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (370/321)
11% (260/29)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (370/49)
17% (206/35)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (295/67)