Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Yuliya Hatouka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Jun at 10:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs Y. Hatouka

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BLR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Friedsam 1 - 0 Hatouka
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2 and Yuliya Hatouka winning 0. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Yuliya Hatouka was at the W50 Palma del Rio, 26-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Friedsam | 1 |
| Hatouka | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W50 Palma del Rio(06-26-25)
A. Friedsam vs Y. Hatouka H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,078,782 | Career Prize Money | $89,059 |
| 59.94% (398-266) | Career Total W/L | 62.81% (255-151) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Friedsam vs Y. Hatouka Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Hatouka has a recent second serve win rate of 33.21%, whereas Friedsam's rate stands at 40.5%. How important is this difference? It is significantly correlated with match outcomes, suggesting Friedsam could have an edge here.
- Return Game Strength: On second serve returns, Hatouka has performed better, claiming 56.34% of points, compared to Friedsam's 48.75%. Does this give Hatouka an advantage? It certainly highlights their strong return game.
- Pressure Handling: Friedsam has a superior ability to save breakpoints, with a 54.94% success rate, over Hatouka's 45%. This ability to perform under pressure might sway match momentum in Friedsam's favor.
- Overall Performance: In the past year, Hatouka won 58.7% of her matches, while Friedsam boasts a higher win percentage at 71.43%. This suggests that Friedsam could be the more consistent performer.
- Surface Preference: Both players perform best on indoor hard courts, with Hatouka at a 68% win rate and Friedsam at 67%. On grass, Hatouka struggles slightly less than Friedsam. Is surface choice a deciding factor? It shows minimal difference on their favored surface.
- Event Level Competence: Comparing last year’s tournament levels, Hatouka has a 56.76% win rate, and Friedsam tops this with 74.36%. How much does level matter? Friedsam's experience at a higher competitive level might prove beneficial.
- Quality of Opposition: Hatouka's opponents had an average rank of 344.52, while Friedsam's were at 287.73. Does opponent quality impact predictions? Playing against stronger players indicates Friedsam's potential resilience.
- Deciding Set Record: In deciding sets, Hatouka shows a 50% win rate, whereas Friedsam has a more favorable 68%. If it goes the distance, Friedsam seems better equipped.
- Break Point Conversion: Hatouka converts 42.51% of break opportunities, outperforming Friedsam's 34.22%. Could this be a pivotal statistic? It signals Hatouka's opportunistic play during critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (June 26, 2025, UTC):
The tennis match presents a fascinating showdown between two players, with contrasting strengths coming into play. Hatouka excels in returning second serves and converting break points, demonstrating tactical prowess in seizing on errors from opponents.
Conversely, Friedsam's consistency in matches, handling pressure effectively, and experience against higher-ranked players suggest a formidable challenge to any adversary. Her superior ability to win deciding sets reinforces her mental edge in tight situations.
Given these factors, while Hatouka could exploit specific in-game opportunities, Friedsam’s comprehensive skill set and proven track record against tougher opposition make her the likely favorite to win the match.
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Yuliya Hatouka Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Friedsam vs Y. Hatouka H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:34:0 | Average Match Time | 1:34:0 |
| 59% (39/66) | 1st Serve % | 69% (50/72) |
| 72% (28/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (33/50) |
| 48% (13/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 42% (30/72) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | L | 7-6(0) 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | L | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
Y. Hatouka Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||

A. Friedsam vs Y. Hatouka Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.94% (398/266) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.81% (255/151) |
| 57.98% (897/650) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.39% (558/366) |
| 53.48% (7684/6683) | Games Win/Loss | 54.54% (4636/3864) |
| 55.67% (108/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.59% (117/67) |
| 59.66% (139/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.33% (56/40) |
| 66.83% (135/67) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65.57% (80/42) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1583 | Aces Total | 1192 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.55 |
| 1702 | Total Double Faults | 2291 |
| 1:11:45 | Average Match Time | 1:24:26 |
| 466.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 506.21 |
| 65% (22459/34590) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15913/25733) |
| 65% (14646/22459) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10254/15913) |
| 46% (5576/12129) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4193/9818) |
| 45% (1711/3768) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1652/3269) |
| 43% (14589/34179) | Return Points Win % | 47% (11925/25283) |
| 36.84% (21/36) | Slam W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 33.33% (10/20) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.88% (101/90) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (9/12) |
| 67.85% (211/100) | Challenger W/L | 60.53% (161/105) |
| 76.81% (53/16) | Futures W/L | 75.45% (83/27) |
| 60% (389/650) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (251/402) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (91/176) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (45/84) |
| 54% (123/229) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (64/116) |
| 85% (391/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (255/224) |
| 14% (391/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (255/31) |
| 23% (273/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (151/31) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
