Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Yexin Ma Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Sep at 10:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs Y. Ma

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Friedsam 1 - 0 Ma
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2 and Yexin Ma winning 0. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Yexin Ma was at the Huzhou Open - Huzhou, 08-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Friedsam | 1 |
| Ma | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Huzhou Open - Huzhou(09-08-25)
A. Friedsam vs Y. Ma H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,078,782 | Career Prize Money | $142,850 |
| 59.94% (398-266) | Career Total W/L | 54.68% (292-242) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
A. Friedsam vs Y. Ma Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Friedsam has a slight edge, winning 41.88% of points on her second serve, compared to Ma, who has won 39.57%. Could this give Friedsam an advantage in critical moments?
- Return Game Strength: Ma has outperformed Friedsam by winning 50.49% of her opponent's second serve points, while Friedsam has won 47.24%. However, for first serve returns, Friedsam edges Ma with 31.7% against 31.11%.
- Pressure Situations: Under pressure, Friedsam has saved 54.28% of breakpoints, offering a better defense than Ma, who has saved 49.11%.
- Overall Performance: Friedsam boasts a stronger win record, achieving 67.24% in victories over the past year compared to Ma's 50%. Does this consistent form make Friedsam the likely favorite?
- Surface Preference: Ma excels on clay with a 56% win rate, while Friedsam's best surface is indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate. Who will adapt better if the match were played on a less favorable surface?
- Tournament Level Experience: Friedsam's experience in higher competition levels gives her an edge, with a 71.11% win record in significant challenger/ITF tournaments compared to Ma’s 52.73%.
- Quality of Opponents: Friedsam has faced tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 270.67 against Ma's 315.11.
- Deciding Set Performance: Friedsam demonstrates resilience in close matches, winning 67% of deciding sets compared to Ma’s 43%.
- Break Point Conversion: Ma is slightly more efficient in converting breakpoint opportunities, with a 35.08% conversion rate versus Friedsam's 32.14%.
Editorial Prediction (September 8, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match presents an intriguing matchup of contrasting styles and recent performances. Both players have shown specific strengths that can influence the match's outcome.
Friedsam has demonstrated a slight advantage in second-serve performance, which can be crucial in high-pressure situations. Additionally, her ability to save breakpoints at a higher percentage might prove valuable during critical phases of the match.
Conversely, Ma has displayed a superior return game, especially against second serves. Her efficient break-point conversion could pose a challenge for Friedsam if she cannot maintain her serve dominance.
Considering Friedsam's superior win record and experience at higher-level tournaments, she seems more equipped to handle tight situations. Her stronger performance in deciding sets suggests resilience and mental strength, which could be pivotal if the match extends to a decider.
Despite Ma's offensive return game and breakpoint conversion skills, Friedsam's overall proficiency and competitive experience provide her with a slight edge. Hence, Friedsam is the favored contender to win this match.
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Yexin Ma Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Friedsam vs Y. Ma H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:59:56 | Average Match Time | 0:59:56 |
| 64% (29/45) | 1st Serve % | 65% (20/31) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 30% (6/20) |
| 38% (6/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 9% (1/11) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 77% (24/31) | Return Points Win % | 38% (17/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | L | 7-6(0) 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | L | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
Y. Ma Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | W | 7-6(5) 7-6(1) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 7-6(6) | ||

A. Friedsam vs Y. Ma Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.94% (398/266) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.68% (292/242) |
| 57.98% (897/650) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.14% (660/559) |
| 53.48% (7684/6683) | Games Win/Loss | 52.36% (5793/5270) |
| 55.67% (108/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.41% (222/186) |
| 59.66% (139/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.79% (40/33) |
| 66.83% (135/67) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.97% (23/16) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (7/7) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1583 | Aces Total | 641 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1702 | Total Double Faults | 1621 |
| 1:11:45 | Average Match Time | 1:26:48 |
| 466.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 489.02 |
| 65% (22459/34590) | 1st Serve % | 59% (17584/29959) |
| 65% (14646/22459) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (10751/17584) |
| 46% (5576/12129) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5693/12373) |
| 45% (1711/3768) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1985/4150) |
| 43% (14589/34179) | Return Points Win % | 47% (14537/30823) |
| 36.84% (21/36) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 33.33% (10/20) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.88% (101/90) | Main Tour W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 67.85% (211/100) | Challenger W/L | 54.01% (175/149) |
| 76.81% (53/16) | Futures W/L | 58.47% (107/76) |
| 60% (389/650) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (285/524) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (91/176) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (52/99) |
| 54% (123/229) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (78/161) |
| 85% (391/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (304/256) |
| 14% (391/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (304/47) |
| 23% (273/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (230/35) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Christoph Negritu Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 27th November 2025 Best Bets

Oleksandra Oliynykova vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 27th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Eva Vedder Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elena Malygina Prediction – WTA W75 Trnava – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Karan Singh Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 26th November 2025 Best Bets
