Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna Tatishvili vs Madison Brengle Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tatishvili vs Brengle analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna Tatishvili vs Madison Brengle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tatishvili has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Brengle has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tatishvili, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brengle has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tatishvili has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brengle has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tatishvili has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brengle winning 50% (W/L 14/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tatishvili has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 189/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 12/ 23). Brengle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 340/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 45/ 45).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Tatishvili winning 4 times. They have played 19 sets in total, with Tatishvili winning 9 and Brengle winning 10. The last match between Tatishvili and Brengle was at the U.S. Open - New York, 02-09-2015, Second, Hard with Madison Brengle getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:7:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tatishvili and Brengle have played a deciding set 5 times, with Tatishvili winning 4 times and Brengle 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tatishvili winning 0, and Brengle 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tatishvili has played against opponents with an average rank of while Brengle has played against players with an average rank of 150.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tatishvili has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brengle has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tatishvili has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brengle has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tatishvili 4 - 3 Brengle
Ret.
Rank
50
High
34
Age
R
Plays
4
Total3
4
Hard3
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
255
Rank
35
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
55% (338-272)
Career Total W/L
56% (556-436)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$573,354
Career Prize Money
$2,482,006
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tatishvili VS Brengle H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Anna Tatishvili | Madison Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 9 | 10 |
| Games Won | 76 | 78 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:7:51 | 0:7:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (32/43) | 63% (27/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (18/32) | 89% (24/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (7/11) | 75% (12/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 16% (7/43) | 42% (18/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 80% (4/5) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Tatishvili VS Brengle H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Madison Brengle
Player
Anna Tatishvili
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 4-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-2 1-6 6-0 | |||||
| 0-6 6-1 6-1 | |||||
| 3-6 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 2-6 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna Tatishvili | Madison Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Anna Tatishvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Grymalska
Player
Anna Tatishvili
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Anna Tatishvili
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anna Tatishvili
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Anna Tatishvili
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
80%
(
45 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
47%
(
16 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Tatishvili
Player
Jovana Jovic
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Tatishvili
Player
Francesca Di Lorenzo
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
54 of
97)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Tatishvili
Player
Tara Moore
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
11
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Madison Brengle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Johanne Svendsen
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
24 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Madison Brengle
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Madison Brengle
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Madison Brengle
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Irina Khromacheva
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Madison Brengle
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
86%
(
49 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Su Jeong Jang
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Mary Stoiana
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tatishvili Vs Brengle Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
