Anna Blinkova vs Chloe Paquet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 03:17 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Blinkova vs C. Paquet

RUS
1
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Blinkova 1 - 1 Paquet
They have played 5 sets in total, with Anna Blinkova winning 3 and Chloe Paquet winning 2. The last match between Anna Blinkova and Chloe Paquet was at the Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang, 28-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Anna Blinkova getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Blinkova | 1 |
| Paquet | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang(10-28-25)
(Q2) U.S. Open - New York(08-25-22)
A. Blinkova vs C. Paquet H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,472,397 | Career Prize Money | $452,820 |
| 56.72% (329-251) | Career Total W/L | 50.59% (429-419) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 50.00% (23-23) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-6) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
A. Blinkova vs C. Paquet Match Preview:
- Anna Blinkova's recent second serve points win rate is 38.47%, while Chloe Paquet's is 41.15%.
- Is the second serve performance linked to match predictions? Yes, it's highly correlated.
- In return games, Blinkova has won 50.61% of her opponent's second serve points; Paquet has won slightly more with 54.04%.
- For first serve returns, Blinkova stands at 32.46% compared to Paquet's 34.81%.
- Can breakpoints saved indicate performance under pressure? Yes, Blinkova saves 48.58% and Paquet saves 50.37%.
- Over the past year, Blinkova won 47.27% of her matches, while Paquet won 38.18%.
- Blinkova's best surface is indoor hard, winning 67% of her matches, and her weakest is grass with a 50% win rate.
- Paquet excels on clay with a 67% win rate but struggles on grass at 35%.
- Blinkova competes mostly on the Main tour with a 48.39% win rate; Paquet mostly plays ITF tournaments, winning 50%.
- In direct H2H encounters, Paquet has the upper hand with one match win against Blinkova.
- Their last match saw Paquet win 2-1 sets at the U.S. Open on a hard court.
- Which player faces stronger opponents on average? Blinkova competes against players ranked around 99.47, while Paquet's opponents average a 175.4 rank.
- In deciding sets, Blinkova wins 50%, whereas Paquet wins just 23% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming match, Chloe Paquet possesses a slight advantage in recent second serve and breakpoints saved statistics compared to Anna Blinkova.
Although Paquet leads in head-to-head matches, having won a tough three-setter recently, Blinkova's exposure to higher-ranked opponents and better deciding set performance could make a difference.
Blinkova's capability on indoor hard courts is a significant factor, providing a considerable edge given her higher win percentages on this surface and experience from the Main tour.
In conclusion, despite Chloe Paquet's previous win, Anna Blinkova's overall recent form, statistical strengths, and opposing player caliber suggest she is more likely to win this upcoming match.
Anna Blinkova vs Chloe Paquet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Blinkova vs C. Paquet H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 23 | Games Won | 26 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:52:6 | Average Match Time | 1:52:6 |
| 59% (95/160) | 1st Serve % | 58% (85/147) |
| 67% (64/95) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (61/85) |
| 48% (31/65) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (32/62) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (7/26) |
| 37% (54/147) | Return Points Win % | 41% (65/160) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Blinkova Recent Matches Played
C. Paquet Recent Matches Played

A. Blinkova vs C. Paquet Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.72% (329/251) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.59% (429/419) |
| 55.13% (742/604) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.40% (1012/957) |
| 52.01% (6396/5902) | Games Win/Loss | 50.98% (9239/8885) |
| 53.36% (127/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.83% (99/108) |
| 54.68% (76/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.63% (250/225) |
| 66.67% (98/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.66% (74/75) |
| 50.00% (28/28) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.29% (6/11) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1336 | Aces Total | 2057 |
| 0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2577 | Total Double Faults | 2941 |
| 1:33:27 | Average Match Time | 1:14:17 |
| 341.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.07 |
| 61% (23625/38794) | 1st Serve % | 59% (25227/42536) |
| 62% (14747/23625) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (16161/25227) |
| 44% (6641/15169) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7660/17309) |
| 48% (2414/4988) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2284/5057) |
| 46% (18020/39035) | Return Points Win % | 44% (19107/43126) |
| 51.43% (36/34) | Slam W/L | 29.27% (12/29) |
| 45.76% (27/32) | Masters W/L | 15.38% (2/11) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.56% (116/109) | Main Tour W/L | 41.67% (45/63) |
| 65.20% (133/71) | Challenger W/L | 53.19% (275/242) |
| 80.95% (17/4) | Futures W/L | 56.21% (95/74) |
| 57% (322/567) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (424/836) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 50% (61/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (91/183) |
| 54% (103/189) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (119/273) |
| 87% (323/280) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (455/366) |
| 13% (323/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (455/88) |
| 19% (257/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (393/61) |