Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ann Li vs Gaia Sanesi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Sanesi analysis and find out who is favored!
Ann Li vs Gaia Sanesi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 42.42% of points on his second serve, while Sanesi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 53.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sanesi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 57.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sanesi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 53.7% of matches played (W/L 29/ 25), with Sanesi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13). Sanesi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 235/ 157), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 27/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.35% of matches (W/L 19/ 18), where as Sanesi has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Li winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Sanesi winning 1. The last match between Li and Sanesi was at the W25 Osprey, 26-04-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Ann Li getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Sanesi have played a deciding set 1 times, with Li winning 1 times and Sanesi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Sanesi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.09 while Sanesi has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sanesi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 44.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sanesi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Li 1 - 0 Sanesi
164
Rank
44
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
294
High
32
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
59% (192-134)
Career Total W/L
58% (269-192)
33% (4-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,188,186
Career Prize Money
$3,030
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ann Li | Gaia Sanesi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (56/88) | 67% (55/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (37/56) | 60% (33/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (16/32) | 30% (8/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (41/82) | 40% (35/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Ann Li
Player
Gaia Sanesi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ann Li | Gaia Sanesi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (130/143) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:15 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (565/935) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (352/565) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (152/370) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (50/104) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (395/890) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Ann Li
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Robin Anderson
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(9) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Ann Li
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Kayla Day
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Alyssa Ahn
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Ann Li
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
77
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Ann Li
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adriana Reami
Player
Ann Li
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Ionescu
Player
Ann Li
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Ann Li
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
50%
(
29 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaia Sanesi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Stewart
Player
Gaia Sanesi
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Gaia Sanesi
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Sanesi
Player
Tara Moore
67%
(
76 of
113)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
106)
6
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Gaia Sanesi
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Gaia Sanesi
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Sanesi
Player
Reka-Luca Jani
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Gaia Sanesi
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Melanie Stokke
Player
Gaia Sanesi
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
79%
(
45 of
57)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Gaia Sanesi
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Sanesi
Player
Loudmilla Bencheikh
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Li Vs Sanesi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
