Andrew Watson vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Watson vs Findel-Hawkins analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrew Watson vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Watson has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Watson, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Watson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Findel-Hawkins has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Watson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Findel-Hawkins winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Watson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 73% (W/L 45/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/ 8). Findel-Hawkins has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Watson winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Watson winning 3 and Findel-Hawkins winning 3. The last match between Watson and Findel-Hawkins was at the M25 Dublin, 02-08-2019, Quarterfinals, Carpet with Andrew Watson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Watson and Findel-Hawkins have played a deciding set 2 times, with Watson winning 1 times and Findel-Hawkins 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Watson winning 1, and Findel-Hawkins 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Watson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Findel-Hawkins has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Watson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Watson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Findel-Hawkins has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Watson 1 - 1 Findel-Hawkins
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
535
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
635
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
67% (121-60)
Career Total W/L
59% (70-49)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Watson VS Findel-Hawkins H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Andrew Watson | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
Games Won | 31 | 33 |
Aces (Total) | 15 | 26 |
DFs (Total) | 17 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 2:18:0 | 2:18:0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (115/197) | 57% (104/181) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (89/115) | 80% (83/104) |
2nd Serve Win% | 51% (42/82) | 53% (41/77) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 26% (5/19) |
Return Points W% | 31% (57/181) | 34% (66/197) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Watson VS Findel-Hawkins H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Andrew Watson
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
6
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
6-7(1) 6-2 7-6(5) |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Andrew Watson
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
15
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
25 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
112)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Andrew Watson | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Andrew Watson Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Andrew Watson
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Adrian Andreev
Player
Andrew Watson
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrew Watson
Player
Zane Khan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Liam Draxl
Player
Andrew Watson
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrew Watson
Player
Grey Hamilton
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anton Matusevich
Player
Andrew Watson
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Ryan Peniston
Player
Andrew Watson
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
10
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
27%
(
9 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Andrew Watson
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
6
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more