Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrew Paulson vs Jerome Kym Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paulson vs Kym analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrew Paulson vs Jerome Kym Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paulson has won 47.96% of points on his second serve, while Kym has won 51.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paulson, in recent form, has won 49.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kym has won 48.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21% and 35.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paulson has saved 61.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kym has saved 62.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paulson has won 64.81% of matches played (W/L 35/ 19), with Kym winning 67.5% (W/L 27/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paulson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 26/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24). Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 23/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Paulson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 4), where as Kym has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paulson winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Paulson winning 4 and Kym winning 1. The last match between Paulson and Kym was at the Hamburg Challenger, 17-10-2022, Q3, I.hard with Andrew Paulson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paulson and Kym have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paulson winning 1 times and Kym 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paulson winning 0, and Kym 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paulson has played against opponents with an average rank of 299.15 while Kym has played against players with an average rank of 224.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paulson has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kym has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paulson has converted 35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kym has converted 37.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paulson 2 - 0 Kym
319
Rank
302
High
22
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
500
Rank
348
High
21
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
63% (154-91)
Career Total W/L
64% (83-46)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
69% (11-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andrew Paulson | Jerome Kym |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 27 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:45 | 1:40:45 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (95/145) | 63% (93/147) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (72/95) | 66% (61/93) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (24/50) | 43% (23/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 41% (7/17) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (63/147) | 34% (49/145) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Andrew Paulson
Player
Jerome Kym
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Jerome Kym
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
12
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrew Paulson | Jerome Kym |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (11/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (22/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (177/137) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.61 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 92 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 196.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (647/982) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (467/647) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (174/335) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (44/117) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (406/1004) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Andrew Paulson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Andrew Paulson
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
10
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Andrew Paulson
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
101)
20
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Andrew Paulson
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
9
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
6 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
84)
13
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Louis Wessels
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
19
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Tom Gentzsch
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
11
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Jakob Schnaitter
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Andrew Paulson
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
11
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andrew Paulson
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Andrew Paulson
80%
(
68 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Jerome Kym
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Cian Maguire
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Jerome Kym
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Erik Tkalenko
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Jerome Kym
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve %
67%
(
20 of
30)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
31
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Florian Broska
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
Jerome Kym
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Paulson Vs Kym Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
