Andrej Nedic vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to second serve performance, Zahraj has a slight lead, winning 42.78% of points compared to Nedic's 42.18% over the past 6 months. Could this minor edge influence the match outcome? Possibly, as there's a strong statistical link to match predictions.
• In return games, Zahraj has outperformed Nedic against second serves, winning 50.98% versus 45.58%. This advantage might suggest Zahraj could capitalize better on returning opportunities.
• However, for first serve returns, Nedic excels with a win rate of 33.36% compared to Zahraj's 27.78%. This strength could shift match momentum in Nedic’s favor when returning first serves.
• Handling pressure, Zahraj edges out slightly with 52.94% of breakpoints saved, whereas Nedic has saved 50%. This resilience may be important during crucial game moments.
• Nedic boasts a higher win percentage over the last year, 71.01% to Zahraj's 59.52%, suggesting a more consistent performance in recent matches.
• When considering surface preference, Zahraj is more proficient on indoor hard courts with a 65% win rate, whereas Nedic shines on clay with a 66% win rate. Which surface will the match be played on?
• The quality of opponents faced differs slightly, with Zahraj playing against those with an average rank of 406.79, relatively tougher than Nedic’s average opponent rank of 418.26.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Nedic holds a slight advantage, having won 73% of such sets compared to Zahraj’s 67% over the past year.
• In recent form, Nedic converts break points more efficiently, with a rate of 40.43% against Zahraj's 35.59%. This skill could prove decisive in critical matches.

Editorial Prediction (May 9, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performances, Nedic exhibits a higher overall match win percentage over the past year, alongside a superior breakpoint conversion rate. These factors hint at a potentially decisive edge. However, Zahraj’s aptitude in winning second serve points and saving breakpoints might level the playing ground somewhat.

Zahraj's skills at returning second serves could interrupt Nedic’s rhythm, though Nedic's stronger first serve returns might offset this advantage. The slight disparity in opponents’ rankings and deciding set performances adds layers to the prediction, with both players having unique strengths.

Ultimately, considering the comparative win percentages and current return efficiency trends, Nedic seems marginally favored to win the upcoming match, albeit the contest could swing based on surface conditions and match dynamics.