Andrea Pellegrino vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jun at 12:07 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Pellegrino vs N. Fatic

ITA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

BIH
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Pellegrino 2 - 0 Fatic
They have played 4 sets in total, with Andrea Pellegrino winning 3 and Nerman Fatic winning 1. The last match between Andrea Pellegrino and Nerman Fatic was at the Perugia Challenger, 15-06-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Andrea Pellegrino getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Pellegrino | 2 |
Fatic | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(F) Perugia Challenger(06-15-25)
(SF) San Marino Challenger(08-05-23)
A. Pellegrino vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$204,080 | Career Prize Money | $73,995 |
52.83% (317-283) | Career Total W/L | 58.65% (400-282) |
2 | Clay | 0 |
9 | Titles | 12 |
2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
A. Pellegrino vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Pellegrino has shown stronger second serve performance by winning 45.13% of points compared to Fatic's 41.67%, hinting at an advantage in maintaining service games.
- In terms of returning second serves, Fatic edges out with 43.7% compared to Pellegrino's 41.25%, suggesting a slightly better ability to challenge opponent serves.
- Under pressure, Fatic has a slight upper hand, saving 51.79% of breakpoints while Pellegrino saves 50.36%.
- Considering match outcomes over the last year, Fatic boasts a better win percentage at 71.88% versus Pellegrino's 58.46%.
- Both players perform best on clay, with Fatic having a slightly higher career win rate of 61% over Pellegrino's 56%. Could this influence the outcome on a clay surface?
- In head-to-head encounters, they've remained evenly matched, with each winning one set in their single meeting.
- The last time they met, Pellegrino emerged victorious on clay, winning due to Fatic's retirement after splitting sets.
- When playing against higher-ranked opponents, Pellegrino faces stiffer competition with an opponent average rank of 255.02 compared to Fatic's 353.34, indicating Pellegrino might be more resilient against stronger opponents.
- If this match extends to a deciding set, Pellegrino appears more proficient, with a 76% win rate against Fatic's 68% in such scenarios.
- Fatic is more adept at converting breakpoints, succeeding 37.13% of the time, compared to Pellegrino's 29.65% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their second serve capabilities, Pellegrino has a slight edge, which could be crucial in preserving his service games.
However, Fatic's superior return game and ability to convert breakpoints could offset Pellegrino’s serving strength and put pressure on Pellegrino throughout the match.
Both players display prowess on clay, yet Fatic’s higher win percentage in recent matches, along with his better performance in converting breakpoints, might give him the upper hand.
Given the balance in prior direct confrontations and a potentially close matchup, Fatic’s slight statistical advantages position him as a probable winner in this upcoming encounter.
Andrea Pellegrino vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Pellegrino vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
3 | Sets Won | 1 |
21 | Games Won | 15 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:31:21 | Average Match Time | 1:31:21 |
68% (75/111) | 1st Serve % | 74% (86/117) |
71% (53/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (54/86) |
69% (25/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (15/31) |
33% (4/12) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
41% (48/117) | Return Points Win % | 30% (33/111) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Pellegrino Recent Matches Played
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

A. Pellegrino vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
52.83% (317/283) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.65% (400/282) |
52.21% (733/671) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.62% (881/648) |
50.30% (6627/6548) | Games Win/Loss | 53.05% (7499/6636) |
37.21% (16/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.62% (41/40) |
56.38% (274/212) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.15% (340/216) |
40.00% (26/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.19% (19/24) |
16.67% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
1390 | Aces Total | 1538 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
1551 | Total Double Faults | 1494 |
1:34:47 | Average Match Time | 1:19:43 |
461.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 511.22 |
63% (24750/39209) | 1st Serve % | 67% (23413/35183) |
66% (16220/24750) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15315/23413) |
51% (7313/14459) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5656/11770) |
43% (1705/3938) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1937/4141) |
40% (15704/39156) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15360/35521) |
21.05% (4/15) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
20.00% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
40.00% (12/18) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
51.00% (204/196) | Challenger W/L | 53.21% (116/102) |
65.75% (96/50) | Futures W/L | 63.30% (276/160) |
53% (314/590) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (391/655) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
52% (92/176) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/154) |
53% (110/209) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (101/186) |
82% (312/256) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (390/345) |
18% (312/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (390/41) |
21% (287/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (292/56) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
