Anastasiya Lopata vs Jessica Failla Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 04:02 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Lopata vs J. Failla

UKR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Lopata 0 - 1 Failla
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anastasiya Lopata winning 0 and Jessica Failla winning 2. The last match between Jessica Failla and Anastasiya Lopata was at the W100 Macon, 14-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Jessica Failla getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lopata | 0 |
| Failla | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W100 Macon(10-14-25)
A. Lopata vs J. Failla H2H Profile
A. Lopata vs J. Failla Match Preview:
- In recent second serve performances, Jessica Failla leads with a 45.15% success rate compared to Anastasiya Lopata's 40.00%. Could this give Failla an edge in serve dominance?
- Both players have an almost identical success rate in winning points on their opponent’s second serves: Failla at 55.00% and Lopata barely edging her out at 55.07%.
- Anastasiya Lopata excels on first serve returns, winning 37.88% of points against Jessica Failla's 29.70%, suggesting Lopata's potential superiority in return games.
- Facing breakpoints, Lopata has saved 53.13% compared to Failla’s 47.83%, indicating a possible mental fortitude under pressure.
- Over the past year, Failla’s win rate stands at 32.00%, significantly overshadowed by Lopata’s 87.50% win rate. Who is showing more consistency?
- Both players have their highest career win rates on hard surfaces, each at 67%, showing no clear advantage on surface preference.
- Lopata has shown impeccable form in deciding sets, maintaining a 100% win rate, whereas Failla trails with 40% success. Could this be decisive if they reach a deciding set?
- Despite facing slightly tougher opponents overall, Failla’s competition has been marginally more challenging than Lopata’s when considering opponent rankings.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
When analyzing recent performance data, it becomes evident that both Jessica Failla and Anastasiya Lopata have their distinct strengths. Failla's second serve success may offer a slight tactical advantage, yet Lopata's superior record in return games, especially on first serves, cannot be overlooked.
Additionally, Lopata's higher breakpoint saving percentage suggests a mental edge in clutch situations. Over the past year, Lopata’s win record dominates with significant consistency, indicating a more assured form heading into this match.
The deciding factor may ultimately rest on the players' ability to handle pressure as the match intensifies, with Lopata's flawless track record in deciding sets showcasing her poise and tenacity.
Taking these factors into account, and despite Failla's commendable abilities, Anastasiya Lopata seems the likelier victor in their upcoming encounter.
Anastasiya Lopata vs Jessica Failla Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Lopata vs J. Failla H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:45:13 | Average Match Time | 1:45:13 |
| 50% (33/66) | 1st Serve % | 65% (28/43) |
| 39% (13/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (17/28) |
| 42% (14/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8/15) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 58% (7/12) |
| 42% (18/43) | Return Points Win % | 59% (39/66) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Lopata Recent Matches Played
J. Failla Recent Matches Played

A. Lopata vs J. Failla Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.52% (20/11) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.56% (200/160) |
| 58.90% (43/30) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.12% (447/364) |
| 53.24% (353/310) | Games Win/Loss | 52.82% (3789/3385) |
| 65.00% (13/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.30% (164/138) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65.96% (31/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 53 | Aces Total | 121 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 75 | Total Double Faults | 1060 |
| 1:56:6 | Average Match Time | 1:17:56 |
| 321.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.73 |
| 56% (1157/2055) | 1st Serve % | 69% (11581/16666) |
| 59% (686/1157) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (6676/11581) |
| 46% (412/898) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2217/5085) |
| 46% (140/304) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1167/2358) |
| 49% (1010/2079) | Return Points Win % | 49% (8262/17031) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 71.43% (10/4) | Challenger W/L | 52.69% (137/123) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Futures W/L | 65.26% (62/33) |
| 65% (20/31) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (193/349) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 71% (5/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (19/53) |
| 73% (8/11) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (48/100) |
| 88% (17/15) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (210/182) |
| 12% (17/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (210/27) |
| 36% (14/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (150/17) |