Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ana Konjuh vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Konjuh vs Friedsam analysis and find out who is favored!
Ana Konjuh vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Konjuh has won 41.85% of points on his second serve, while Friedsam has won 46.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Konjuh, in recent form, has won 49.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Friedsam has won 52.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.13% and 31.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Konjuh has saved 56.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Friedsam has saved 61.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Konjuh has won 37.5% of matches played (W/L 6/ 10), with Friedsam winning 43.75% (W/L 21/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Konjuh has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 27/ 16), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 91/ 68). Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 109/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Konjuh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 4/ 6), where as Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 12/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Konjuh winning 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Konjuh winning 5 and Friedsam winning 4. The last match between Konjuh and Friedsam was at the Australian Open Qualifying - Dubai, 10-01-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Ana Konjuh getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:34.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Konjuh and Friedsam have played a deciding set 3 times, with Konjuh winning 2 times and Friedsam 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Konjuh winning 0, and Friedsam 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Konjuh has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.19 while Friedsam has played against players with an average rank of 192.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Konjuh has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Friedsam has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Konjuh has converted 39.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Friedsam has converted 40.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Konjuh 2 - 1 Friedsam
557
Rank
20
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
189
Rank
45
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
60% (256-170)
Career Total W/L
59% (355-242)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
27% (3-8)
$1,940,308
Career Prize Money
$1,003,807
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ana Konjuh | Anna-Lena Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 4 |
| Games Won | 47 | 42 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 15 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:34 | 1:28:34 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (118/200) | 61% (115/187) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (83/118) | 70% (80/115) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (37/82) | 47% (34/72) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 41% (9/22) | 38% (8/21) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (73/187) | 40% (80/200) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Ana Konjuh
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
104)
9
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Ana Konjuh
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ana Konjuh | Anna-Lena Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 27% (3/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 34% (10/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (72/74) | 43% (114/153) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:20 | 1:57:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 225.83 | 197.91 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (263/447) | 68% (601/886) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (189/263) | 60% (360/601) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (77/184) | 43% (122/285) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (21/53) | 35% (32/91) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (188/457) | 40% (350/877) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 27% (3/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 43% (7/3) |
Ana Konjuh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Peangtarn Plipuech
Player
Ana Konjuh
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Meng Yi Chen
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Yiming Dang
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Ana Konjuh
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
9
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
110)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ylena In-Albon
Player
Ana Konjuh
82%
(
73 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Ana Konjuh
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Ylena In-Albon
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Ana Konjuh
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
3
Aces
14
7
Double Faults
8
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
33
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Talia Gibson
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
7
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Greetje Minnen
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Konjuh Vs Friedsam Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
