Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ana Candiotto vs Teja Tirunelveli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Candiotto vs Tirunelveli analysis and find out who is favored!
Ana Candiotto vs Teja Tirunelveli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Candiotto has won 40.81% of points on his second serve, while Tirunelveli has won 52.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Candiotto, in recent form, has won 52.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tirunelveli has won 50.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.02% and 39.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Candiotto has saved 50.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tirunelveli has saved 56.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Candiotto has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/ 33), with Tirunelveli winning 44.83% (W/L 13/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Candiotto has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 42/ 46), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19). Tirunelveli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 21/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 12/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Candiotto has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.11% of matches (W/L 16/ 22), where as Tirunelveli has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Candiotto winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Candiotto winning 2 and Tirunelveli winning 0. The last match between Candiotto and Tirunelveli was at the W15 Mar del Plata, 22-11-2022, First, Clay with Ana Candiotto getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Candiotto and Tirunelveli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Candiotto winning 0 times and Tirunelveli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Candiotto winning 0, and Tirunelveli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Candiotto has played against opponents with an average rank of 172.92 while Tirunelveli has played against players with an average rank of 97.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Candiotto has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tirunelveli has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Candiotto has converted 48.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tirunelveli has converted 41.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Candiotto 1 - 0 Tirunelveli
583
Rank
571
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
45% (54-65)
Career Total W/L
40% (33-50)
38% (6-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Candiotto VS Tirunelveli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Ana Candiotto | Teja Tirunelveli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (34/53) | 68% (40/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (21/34) | 33% (13/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (11/19) | 63% (12/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (34/59) | 40% (21/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Candiotto VS Tirunelveli H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Ana Candiotto
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ana Candiotto | Teja Tirunelveli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 39% (14/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (151/179) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.6 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 97 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 204.63 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (633/1102) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (377/633) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (179/469) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (63/131) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (480/1069) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ana Candiotto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ana Candiotto
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Ana Candiotto
39%
(
20 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Ana Candiotto
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ana Candiotto
Player
Jimar Gerald Gonzalez
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
6
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
25%
(
9 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
44)
79%
(
11 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
59%
(
44 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Candiotto
Player
Ana Cruz
42%
(
28 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fernanda Labrana
Player
Ana Candiotto
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
Player
Ana Candiotto
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Candiotto
Player
Marian Gomez Pezuela Cano
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Ana Candiotto
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Candiotto
Player
Maria Paulina Perez Garcia
62%
(
71 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
52 of
72)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Teja Tirunelveli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Angella Okutoyi
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teja Tirunelveli
Player
Anna Sedysheva
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanie Auer
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cara Maria Mester
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kateryna Lazarenko
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teja Tirunelveli
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Teja Tirunelveli
Player
Yasmine Wagner
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teja Tirunelveli
Player
Olivia Bergler
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johanna Silva
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rositsa Dencheva
Player
Teja Tirunelveli
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Candiotto Vs Tirunelveli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
