Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amy Frazier vs Sofia Arvidsson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Frazier vs Arvidsson analysis and find out who is favored!
Amy Frazier vs Sofia Arvidsson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frazier has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Arvidsson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frazier, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Arvidsson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Frazier has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Arvidsson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Frazier has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Arvidsson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Frazier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 289/ 167), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 40/ 44). Arvidsson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 177/ 88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 14/ 26).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Frazier winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Frazier winning 2 and Arvidsson winning 2. The last match between Frazier and Arvidsson was at the Regions Morgan Keegan Champ's & the Cellular South Cup - Memphis, 24-02-2006, Semifinals, I.hard with Sofia Arvidsson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Frazier and Arvidsson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Frazier winning 0 times and Arvidsson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Frazier winning 0, and Arvidsson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frazier has played against opponents with an average rank of while Arvidsson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frazier has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Arvidsson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Frazier has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Arvidsson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Frazier 1 - 1 Arvidsson
Ret.
Rank
13
High
51
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
29
High
40
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
59% (480-331)
Career Total W/L
57% (431-327)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$127,400
Career Prize Money
$813,969
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Amy Frazier | Sofia Arvidsson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (31/61) | 78% (31/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (16/31) | 74% (23/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (12/30) | 78% (7/9) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 25% (10/40) | 54% (33/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Sofia Arvidsson
Player
Amy Frazier
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
10
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 6-1 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amy Frazier | Sofia Arvidsson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amy Frazier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jill Craybas
Player
Amy Frazier
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Amy Frazier
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Serena Williams
Player
Amy Frazier
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amy Frazier
Player
Gisela Dulko
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amy Frazier
Player
Jessica Kirkland
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Amy Frazier
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Sofia Arvidsson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mandy Minella
Player
Sofia Arvidsson
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiya Komardina
Player
Sofia Arvidsson
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lara Arruabarrena
Player
Sofia Arvidsson
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Frazier Vs Arvidsson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
